Public Health Agency of Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

Epi-Update
Crystal methamphetamine use among Canadian street-involved youth (1999-2005): Results from the Enhanced Canadian Street Youth Surveillance (E-SYS) program

(PDF Version 70 kb)

At a Glance

  • Between 1999 and 2005, the overall level of reported crystal methamphetamine (crystal meth) among street-involved youth was 5.8%.
  • There has been an increase in the proportion of street-involved youth reporting crystal meth as being one of the drugs used most often during the past three months - from 2.5% in 1999 to 9.5% in 2005 (p<0.0001)
  • Street-involved youth who reported crystal meth use were more likely to:
    • reside in Western Canada (compared to Eastern Canada);
    • be older and Caucasian;
    • have a history of interaction with social service agencies and the justice system;
    • report current cigarette smoking and a history of injecting drugs and using other non-injecting drugs;
    • report practising high-risk sexual behaviours (e.g. no regular sex partner, same sex partner and having obligation sex);and  
    • Having been previously diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

Introduction

Crystal methamphetamine (crystal meth) is a purified form of methamphetamine, a potent central nervous system stimulant. It is a highly addictive drug. Crystal meth users may experience anxiety, depression, mental confusion, fatigue and headaches after initially feeling powerful and confident, having endless energy, increased productivity, enhanced sexual performance and reduced appetite. Long-term use of crystal meth can cause severe changes in the brain which account for many of mental health problems among its abusers.1

Despite reports that the levels of crystal meth use among the general youth population have decreased in North America,1-4 its use remains high in some marginalised populations, including street-involved youth. For example, in one study, 67% in street-involved youth in British Columbia reported having used crystal meth.5 Another study found that homosexual or bisexual students were 26 times more likely to have used crystal meth than their heterosexual counterparts.6

The purpose of this Epi-Update is to provide information on the proportion of street-involved youth across Canada who report using crystal meth, whether these proportions have changed over time, and what factors are associated with its use. The results presented here are based on the data collected through the Enhanced Canadian Street Youth Surveillance (E-SYS) program between1999 and 2005. The E-SYS is an ongoing, multi-centre surveillance system that describes changing patterns of sexually transmitted bloodborne infections (STBBIs) and associated factors (including drug use) among street-involved youth in Canada. A total of 6,053 participants were included in the analysis from seven cities across Canada (Vancouver, Edmonton, Saskatoon, Winnipeg, Ottawa, Toronto, and Halifax).  The analysis only considers non-injecting use of crystal meth. Crystal meth users were identified as those street-involved youth who reported this drug as being one of the drugs they used most often during the past three months.

Results

Level of crystal meth use (Figure 1):

  • Overall, a total of 353 of 6,053 (5.8%) street-involved youth reported crystal meth as being the drug that they most often used over the past three months.
  • The proportion reporting crystal meth use has significantly increased from 2.5% in 1999 to 9.5% in 2005 (p<0.001) and has been observed among the younger (15-19 years) and older (20-24 years) street-involved youth participants.

Level of crystal meth use

Note: Data from Vancouver in 2001 and Winnipeg in 2005 are not available.

Crystal meth use and demographics (Table 1):

  • Street-involved youth who reported crystal meth use were more likely to be older (20-24 years vs. 15-19 years) and Caucasian.
  • Big geographic differences reported crystal meth use were observed; more than half of street-involved youth reporting crystal meth user ‘resided’ in Vancouver.
  • Caucasians were more likely to be crystal meth users.
  • There was no significant difference in crystal meth use between males and females, Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal, Canadian-born and non-Canadian-born and for those with different educational levels.
Top of Page
Table 1: Demographics

Characteristic

Crystal meth use n (%)*

OR (95% CI)**

P-value

Age(year)

15-19

186 (5.9)

Ref

 

20-24

167 (8.2)

1.4 (1.1, 1.8)

0.0016

City

Vancouver

181 (25.6)

19.9 (11.2, 35.3)

<0.0001

Edmonton

93 (7.4)

4.9 (2.7, 8.8)

<0.0001

Saskatoon

15 (2.2)

1.3 (0.6, 2.7)

0.55

Winnipeg

20 (2.8)

1.6 (0.8, 3.3)

0.18

Toronto

28 (2.1)

1.4 (0.7, 2.8)

0.28

Ottawa

13 (1.8)

Ref

 

Halifax

3 (0.5)

0.3 (0.1, 1.1)

0.066

Ethnicity

Caucasian

264 (8.2%)

1.9 (1.5, 2.4)

<0.0001

Other

89 (4.6%)

Ref

 

* Proportion of the use in bracket;     ** Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

 

Interaction with social and correctional services/family (Table 2):

  • Street-involved youth who reported a history of accessing social service and/or being in a jail or in a remand centre were more likely to report crystal meth use. 
  • Reported use of crystal meth was higher among those who were not living with their parents.
Table 2: Social and correctional services/ family

Characteristic

Crystal meth use n (%)

OR
(95% CI)

value

Ever been in foster care

No

180 (5.8)

Ref

 

Yes

173 (8.3)

1.5 (1.2, 1.8)

0.0005

Ever had a social worker

No

84 (5.4)

Ref

 

Yes

268 (7.4)

1.4 (1.1, 1.8)

0.0073

Ever been in a group home

No

168 (5.9)

Ref

 

Yes

185 (8.0)

185 (8.0)

0.0032

Ever been in jail / detention facility

No

117 (5.8)

Ref

 

Yes (overnight or longer)

232 (7.5)

1.3 (1.1, 1.7)

0.016

Ever had a probation officer

No

126 (5.2)

Ref

 

Yes

226 (8.2)

1.6 (1.3, 2.0)

<0.001

Currently living  with parent

No

335 (7.6)

3.9 (2.2, 6.9)

<0.001

Yes

13 (2.1)

Ref

 

 

Other substance use (Table 3):

  • Frequency of smoking cigarettes was significantly related to reported crystal meth use.
  • Alcohol consumption was not linearly related to crystal meth use.
  • There was no difference in crystal meth use among those who reported binging on alcohol and those who did not.
  • Street-involved youth who reported other non-injecting drug use or injecting drug use were more likely to report crystal meth use.
  • Among those who reported crystal meth use, the leading reported other non-injecting drugs were: marijuana (51.3%), crack (19.3%), cocaine (13.3%) and ecstasy (13.3%); and the most commonly injecting drugs reported were: cocaine (34.6%), heroin (30.8%) and morphine (26.2%).
Top of Page
Table 3: Other substance use

Characteristic

Crystal meth use n (%)

OR
(95% CI)

value

Smoking

Never

11 (2.6)

Ref

 

Occasionally

18 (4.6)

1.8 (0.8, 3.8)

0.14

Everyday

323 (7.4)

3.0 (1.6, 5.5)

0.0005

Drinking

Never

103 (10.8)

Ref

 

Occasionally

154 (6.5)

0.57 (0.44, 0.74)

<0.0001

Regularly, one or two times a week

40 (4.3)

0.37 (0.25, 0.54)

<0.0001

Regularly, three or five times a week

31 (6.2)

0.54 (0.36, 0.82)

0.004

Everyday

25 (6.7)

0.59 (0.38, 0.93)

0.023

Other non-injecting drug use*

No

38 (3.2)

Ref

 

Yes

54 (21.5)

8.2 (5.3, 12.7)

<0.0001

Injecting drug use

No

216 (5.4)

Ref

 

Yes

137 (11.9)

2.4 (1.9, 3.0)

<0.0001

* Includes period between 2001 to 2005

Sexual behaviors/prior STI (Table 4):  

  • Street-involved youth reporting crystal meth use were more likely to also report high-risk sexual behaviours in their lifetime, including no regular sex partner, same sex partner and having obligation sex. They were also more likely to report having had an STI.
  • Among the factors examined, trade sex, family-related authority sex, or sex with someone diagnosed with an STI, were not significantly associated with reported crystal meth use.
Table 4: Sexual behaviours/prior STI

Characteristic

Crystal meth use n (%)

OR
(95% CI)

value

Ever had male same sex partner (MSM)

No

167 (6.3)

Ref

 

Yes

47 (10.7)

1.8 (1.3, 2.5)

0.0011

Ever had female same sex partner (FSF)

No

63 (5.3)

Ref

 

Yes

73 (10.7)

2.2 (1.5, 3.1)

<0.0001

Ever had obligation sex

No

201 (9.1)

Ref

 

Yes

68 (13.5)

1.6 (1.2, 2.1)

0.0034

Ever had sex with regular partner(s)

No

71 (12.7)

1.4 (1.1, 1.9)

 

Yes (overnight or longer)

199(9.2)

Ref

0.015

Had a history of STI

No

242 (6.4)

Ref

 

Yes

109 (8.8)

1.4 (1.1, 1.8)

0.0046

 

Prevalence of STBBIs (Table 5):  

  • Street-involved youth diagnosed with hepatitis C infection reported marginally higher levels of crystal meth use.  
  • Differences in reported crystal meth use did not reach a significant level for diagnosis with any single STI.
Table 5: Prevalence of hepatitis C

Characteristic

Crystal meth use n (%)

OR
(95% CI)

value

Hepatitis C infection

No

241 (6.6)

Ref

 

Yes

19 (10.3)

1.6 (1.0, 2.7)

0.052

 

Top of Page

Discussion

The proportion of street-involved youth participating in E-SYS who reported crystal meth use over the past three months has increased almost four fold from 2.5% in 1999 to 9.5% in 2005 (p<0.0001). These rates are between two and nine times higher than the numbers reported from general youth populations in Canada depending upon the city7-8 . These rates among street-involved youth are alarming particularly since crystal meth is a highly addictive drug and has devastating effects on the mental and physical health for long term users. Furthermore, treatment is challenging because of the lack of effective medication or other behavioural approaches with long-term benefits.

The rates of crystal meth use among the street-involved youth population make it clear that actions are needed to reduce the rates of substance abuse and lessen the impacts of associated social, physical, and psychological harms. Given distinct geographic differences in reported crystal meth use, multi-faceted but locally relevant approaches addressing broader determinants of health are needed, as single-issue public health interventions are unlikely to address the root causes of risk behaviours among this uniquely vulnerable population.

References

  1. Buxton, J.A. et N.A. Dove. « The burden and management of crystal meth use ». CMAJ, 2008, 178(12):1537-1539.
  2. Adlaf, E.M. et A. Paglia-Boak. Drug use among Ontario students 1997-2005 pdf, Toronto: Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, 2005.
  3. The McCreay Centre Society. Healthy youth development: Highlights from the 2003 Adolescent Health Survey Ш pdf. Vancouver: The McCreay Centre Society, 2004.
  4. « Youth risk behaviour surveillance – United States, 2005 », MMWR surveill Summ 2006, 55:1-108.
  5. Martin, I., T.M. Lampinen et D. McGhee. « Methamphetamine use among marginalized youth in British Columbia », Can J Public Health, 2006, 97:320-324.
  6. Lampinen, T.M., D. McGhee et I. Martin. « Increased risk of “club” drug use among gay and bisexual high school students in British Columbia », J Adolesc Health, 2006, 38:458-461.
  7. Poulin, C. et D. Elliott. Student drug use survey in the Atlantic Provinces, 2007 pdf: Atlantic technical report, Halifax, Université Dalhousie, 2007.
  8. Adlaf, E.M. et A. Paglia-Boak. Drug use among Ontario students 1977-2005 pdf. Toronto: Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, 2005.

Acknowledgements

Enhanced Canadian Street Youth Surveillance is possible as a result of collaboration between the Public Health Agency of Canada and researchers, provincial and local health authorities and community based organisations from participating sites across Canada. The organisations and people associated with E-SYS can be retrieved at http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/sti-its-surv-epi/youth-jeunes-eng.php. Special thanks to the street-involved youth who consented to participate in E-SYS.

For more information, please contact:
Surveillance and Epidemiology Section
Community Acquired Infections Division
Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control
Tunney’s Pasture
Postal Locator: 0603B
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9
Fax: (613) 941-9813