* Scroll down for an update chart to the Quick Reference
The Quick Reference: Canadian Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections 2006 Edition is a summary document to the Canadian Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections 2006 Edition. The Quick Reference provides information on specific syndromes and infections contained in the Canadian Guidleines on Sexually Transmitted Infections 2006 Edition.
In 2008, the 2006 Edition of the Canadian Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections was updated and reformatted to reflect changes in the diagnosis, management, treatment and prevention of sexually transmitted infections. The Quick Reference has been compared to the 2008 update to locate any inconsistencies. The chart below highlights changes which should be made in the Quick Reference: Canadian Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections 2006 Edition to ensure the information is consistent with the 2008 updates and any subsequent updates and chapter revisions of the Canadian Guidleines on Sexually Transmitted Infections.
Please note the Quick Reference refers to uncomplicated cases among adults. For further detail and recommendations and information on complicated cases and those in other populations including prepubertal children, please consult the 2008 update of the Canadian Guidelines on Sexually Transmitted Infections.
**Please note that the PDF and print version of the Quick Reference document do not include the updates.
Page |
Current Text |
Revised Text |
|---|---|---|
12 (NEW-January 2010) |
Your patient has…Genital Ulcer Disease (GUD) Under Specimen collection and testing for all patients with anogenital ulcers
|
and dark-field examination or direct/indirect fluorescent antibody (DFA/IFA) or NAAT (e.g., PCR) test on swabs from ulcers. Contact your local laboratory regarding these tests, as they are not widely available. Note: Dark-field microscopy and direct/indirect fluorescent antibody tests are not reliable for rectal lesions, as there may be cross-reaction with non-pathogenic treponemes in anal specimens. NAAT (e.g., PCR) testing may be an option for such specimens. |
- Treponemal test (MHA-TP/TP-PA/FTA-ABS) or treponemal specific EIA |
- Should include a non-treponemal test (e.g., RPR/VDRL). OR - A treponemal-specific enzyme immunoassay (EIA) AND if the treponemal-specific EIA is positive, confirmation by a second treponemal-specific test is recommended (e.g., TP-PA, MHA-TP, FTA-ABS or INNO-LIA™). |
|
15 (NEW-January 2010) |
Your patient has…Intestinal Symptoms
|
Note: Dark-field examination and direct/indirect fluorescent antibody tests (DFA/IFA) are not reliable for rectal lesions, as there may be cross-reaction with non-pathogenic treponemes in rectal specimens. NAAT (e.g., PCR) testing may be an option for such specimens. |
18 |
Your patient has… |
Your patient has… |
19 |
Your patient has…Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) |
Vaginal swab for wetmount, PH test, whiff test, Gram stain and culture |
24 |
Treatment Recommendations |
Due to the rapid increase in quinolone resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, quinolones such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin are no longer preferred drugs for the treatment of gonococcal infections in Canada. Quinolones may be considered as an alternative treatment option ONLY IF: (1) antimicrobial susceptibility testing is available and quinolone susceptibility is demonstrated OR (2) where antimicrobial testing is not available, a test of cure is essential. |
24 |
N/A |
Flouroquinolone warning For all infections where treatment recommendations include fluoroquinolones. Note: Fluorquinolone associated tendon rupture (generally Achilles tendon) has been reported predominantly in the elderly on prior systemic treatment with glucocorticoids. At any sign of tendonitis, a physician should be consulted and the quinolone treatment should be discontinued. Quinolones should not be used in patients with a clear history of tendon disorders related to quinolone treatment because they may be at risk of developing tendon disorders again when re-exposed to a quinolone. Please consult the FDA website |
30 |
Treatment Recommendations |
Refer to the Gonococcal Infections chapter of the complete Guidelines, page 9, Table 7, text under the Preferred and Alternatives headings plus the accompanying Notes for the table. |
33 |
Treatment Recommendations Preferred
|
Infectious Syphilis in all non-pregnant adults
Preferred
|
Alternative (only in exceptional circumstances)
|
Alternative (only in exceptional circumstances)†
†The efficacy data supporting the use of these agents is limited, and as such they should only be used in exceptional circumstances and when close patient follow-up is assured. |
|
Treatment Recommendations Alternative (only in exceptional circumstances)
|
Non-Infectious Syphilis in all non-pregnant adults
Alternative (only in exceptional circumstances)†
†The efficacy data supporting the use of these agents is limited, and as such they should only be used in exceptional circumstances and when close patient follow-up is assured. |
|
36 |
Partner Notification Trace-back period: |
Trace-back period*: (Note to be added below the table) The length of time for the trace-back period should be extended: 1) to include additional time up to the date of treatment |
40 |
Table: Interpretation of Serologic Tests for Syphilis |
Replace with the revised table “Table 2: Guide to interpretation of serologic tests for syphilis” found within the revised Syphilis chapter (January 2010), pages 7-12, in the complete Guidelines. |
41 |
Table: Post-Treatment Monitoring of Non-Treponemal Tests (NTTs) |
Refer to the following tables in the revised Syphilis chapter (January 2010), in the complete Guidelines. Table 6: Monitoring of serologic tests and other follow-up on page 21. Table 8a: Summary of medical management of immunocompetent women found to have reactive syphilis serology during pregnancy on page 24. Table 8b: Management of infants born to women with reactive treponemal tests (TTs) during pregnancy on pages 25-28. |
Table: Assessing Adequate Serologic Response to Treatment |
Refer to the updated Table 7: Adequate serologic response, page 21 in the revised Syphilis chapter (January 2010) in the complete Guidelines. |
|
43 |
Algorithms |
If “No gram stain results available and the individual is high-risk for STI and follow-up cannot be assured” then |
44 |
Algorithms |
If “< 5 PMNs per high power field” then “Defer treatment unless the individual is high risk for infection and follow up is not assured in which case treat for gonorrhea and chlamydia” |
45 |
Algorithms
|
- In regions experiencing outbreaks of syphilis and where NTT is the screening test, it may be appropriate to screen at baseline with both non-treponemal and treponemal tests OR - A treponemal-specific enzyme immunoassay (EIA) AND if the treponemal-specific EIA is positive, confirmation by a second treponemal-specific test is recommended (e.g., TP-PA, MHA-TP, FTA-ABS or INNO-LIA™). If the initial serologic testing is negative and syphilis is suspected, serological testing should be repeated in 2-4 weeks. |
Footnote# 1. Not recommended for oral or rectal lesions. |
1. Not recommended for oral or rectal lesions. For syphilis see page 6. For HSV see pages 4-5 (in the respective chapters of the complete Guidelines). |
|
General |
N/A |
Discuss HPV vaccination with females. |