Public Health Agency of Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

Share this page

Summary of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Cases: Canada and International

May 14, 2003

Canada

Since May 7, 2003, no additional probable cases of SARS have been reported. The total number of probable cases reported to date in Canada, by reported symptom onset date and type of exposure (where known), is provided below (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1: Number of probable cases of SARS in Canada by symptom onset date and exposure type: February 23 to May 14, 2003
(N=141*, excludes 1 for whom onset date is unknown)

Number of probable cases of SARS in Canada by symptom onset date and exposure type

* Epi Curve may change as information on cases is updated by P/T Ministries of Health
** Presently, the Other/Autres category includes 6 individuals associated with the Bukas LoobSa Diyos Covenant Community (BLD) group.

Source: Provincial-Territorial Ministries of Health

 

The current status of all probable and suspect cases in Canada as of May 14, 2003 is presented in Tables 1 and 2. Of the 319 probable and suspect SARS cases identified to date, most (82%, 263 of 319) have been discharged from hospital or have recovered at home. An additional 20 of the 319 (6%) suspect and probable cases are currently stable or recovering at home. Most of the case fatalities reported have occurred in patients with underlying illness, and nearly all were elderly patients over the age of 70 years.

Table 1: Current Status of Probable SARS Cases in Canada During the Previous 10 days

Probable Cases May
5
May
6
May
7
May
8
May
9
May
10
May
11
May
12
May
13
May
14
Cumulative total* 148 146 146 145 145 143 143 143 143 142
Active cases (currently ill)
Hospitalized 32 30 29 28 26 23 23 21 16 12
At home, currently ill 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Active Probable 33 31 29 29 26 23 23 21 16 12
Historical cases (recovered and deaths)
Discharged from hospital and
recovered, never hospitalized
93 93 95 95 97 98 98 99 104 107
Deaths 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23

*Cumulative total of all active and historical probable cases with onset of symptoms on or after February 23, 2003, including cases who have recovered, died or are currently ill.

Table 2: Current Status of Suspect SARS Cases in Canada During the Previous 10 days

Suspect Cases May
5
May
6
May
7
May
8
May
9
May
10
May
11
May
12
May
13
May
14
Cumulative total* 179 180 183 182 178 178 178 175 178 177
Active cases (currently ill)
Hospitalized 16 16 16 16 15 14 14 13 7 0
At home, currently ill 17 17 18 17 17 19 19 17 19 20
Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Active Suspect 33 33 34 33 32 33 33 30 26 20
Historical cases (recovered and deaths)
Discharged from hospital and
recovered, never hospitalized
145 146 148 148 145 144 144 144 151 156
Deaths 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

*Cumulative total of all active and historical suspect cases with onset of symptoms on or after February 23, 2003 , including cases who have recovered, died or are currently ill.

As of May 14, 2003, a total of 142 individuals who meet the probable case definition and 177 who meet the suspect case definition of SARS have been reported, including 24 deaths (Table 3). Since May 7, 2003, one new suspect case has been reported from British Columbia with symptoms onset on April 25, 2003. As well, an additional death occured on May 11, 2003, in a probable case from Ontario.


Table 3: Cumulative Number of SARS Cases Reported in Canada: May 14, 2003

Province/Territory Individuals Meeting the Criteria for a: Number of Deaths**
Probable Case* Suspect Case*
British Columbia 4 44 0
Alberta 0 6 0
Saskatchewan 0 1 0
Manitoba 0 0 0
Ontario 138 120 24**
Quebec 0 0 0
Nova Scotia 0 0 0
Newfoundland 0 0 0
New Brunswick 0 2 0
Prince Edward Island 0 4 0
Nunavut 0 0 0
North West Territories 0 0 0
Yukon 0 0 0
TOTAL 142 177 24

* Persons may be excluded from the probable or suspect case list if another cause is identified to fully explain their illness. Case numbers may change as cases are reclassifed based on new information (e.g. disease progression or re-evaluation of the data).
** 23 of 24 deaths were probable cases, while 1 was a suspect case. Another death, not included in this total count occurred in a 46-year-old female who died in the Philippines on April 14, 2003. It is believed she may have contracted SARS while in Toronto.

The current evidence suggests that respiratory droplet transmission, requiring close contact with a case of SARS, is the main mode of transmission. Based on data available from 42 probable or suspect cases with a single known contact with a SARS case, the mean incubation period is 5 days (median 4 days, range 2 to 10 days).

In the province of Ontario, the majority of cases have been associated with specific transmission settings, such as household, hospital, and specific community groups or settings. In community settings, a total of 20 probable and 11 suspect cases of SARS were identified in a religious community group (BLD cluster), however among these, exposure was attributed mainly to health care and household settings. Four members of the index family who are members of this religious group had contact with a SARS case in the emergency room of a Toronto hospital on March 16, 2003. Three of these developed SARS after the exposure, and the infection subsequently spread through their extended family. By April 12, 2003, all members of the religious group were quarantined, in an effort to contain any further spread within and outside of this social network. In total, fourteen members of the index family, 3 health care workers and 14 other religious group members have been identified as probable or suspect cases of SARS. The religious group has since completed their quarantine with no further cases identified through extensive case finding and contact tracing efforts.

Following the implementation of strict infection control measures in all Ontario hospitals, transmission of SARS to hospital workers has decreased substantially. Despite these measures, there have been reports of transmission to hospital workers. In 3 different hospitals, transmission has been attributed to exposure during difficult intubations. In two, undiagnosed patients were identified as the source of transmission for 7 hospital workers. Compliance with infection control precautions by staff may not have been complete. In the third, a SARS patient was identified as the source of infection for 9 hospital staff during a difficult intubation. In addition, transmission of SARS to 6 hospital staff has also been identified in 5 different low-risk SARS units. Initial investigation suggests that transmission in these settings has occurred while staff were wearing required personal protective equipment and following all recommended infection control precautions. A comprehensive investigation is presently underway involving experts from Health Canada, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Province of Ontario, and Toronto Public Health.

In British Columbia, the fourth probable case (onset April 4, 2003) was a health care worker who was exposed to the second travel-related probable case in that province. There are no further cases associated with this this 4th probable case.

Travellers who have returned from an affected area in Asia and their close contacts account for the remaining cases in Ontario and the other provinces.
The list of at-risk settings in the province of Ontario can be obtained at the following address: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/public/updates/
archives/hu_03/hu_sars.html

top

International

Since November 1, 2002, 7,627 cases of SARS (7,485 outside of Canada) have been reported to the World Health Organization (Table 4). Outside of mainland China, the vast majority of reported cases have originated from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China. As of May 14, 2003, 564 deaths have been reported outside of Canada, the majority (494) of which were reported in mainland China and Hong Kong, SAR.

The WHO is reporting that the severity of illness in cases linked to the previously identified cluster of cases in the Amoy Gardens housing complex is greater, relative to cases derived from other exposure settings. The report indicates that while 20% of Amoy-related cases require intensive care, this is true for only 10% of non-Amoy-related cases. In addition, 66% of Amoy Gardens patients present with diarrhea as a symptom, compared to only 2% to 7% of cases in other related-outbreaks.


Table 4: Cumulative Number of SARS Cases* and Deaths Reported to the World Health Organisation: November 1, 2002 to May 14, 2003

Country Number of Cases Number of Deaths
Australia 6 0
Brazil 2 0
Bulgaria 1 0
Canada 142 24**
China, mainland*** 5124 267
China, Hong Kong SAR 1698 227****
China, Macao Special Administrative Region 1 0
China, Taiwan 238 30
Colombia 1 0
Finland 1 0
France 7 0
Germany 9 0
India 3 0
Indonesia 2 0
Italy 9 0
Kuwait 1 0
Malaysia 7 2
Mongolia 9 0
New Zealand 1 0
Philippines 10 2
Republic of Ireland 1 0
Republic of Korea 3 0
Romania 1 0
Singapore 205 28
South Africa 1 1
Spain 1 0
Sweden 3 0
Switzerland 1 0
Thailand 8 2
United Kingdom 4 0
United States 64* 0
Vietnam 63 5
TOTAL 7627 588

*Cumulative number of cases includes deaths. Case definitions vary from one country to another. Only probable cases are being reported by all countries. The US will no longer be reporting suspect cases under investigation as of April 21, 2003.

**23 of 24 deaths were in probable cases and 1 was in suspect cases.

***The start of the period of surveillance was changed to November 1 2002 to capture cases of atypical pneumonia in China that are now recognised as being cases of SARS.

****One death attributed to Hong Kong SAR occurred in a case medically transferred from Vietnam.

Source: http://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/2003_05_14/en/, with updates from Canada.