CATMAT statement on disseminated strongyloidiasis

banner

Download this article as a PDF (171 KB - 8 pages)
Published by: The Public Health Agency of Canada
Issue: Volume 42-1: Emerging infectious diseases
Date published: January 7, 2016
ISSN: 1481-8531

Subscribe to CCDR

Submit a manuscript

About CCDR

Browse

Past issues

Volume 42-1, January 7, 2016: Emerging infectious diseases

Advisory Committee Statement

CATMAT statement on disseminated strongyloidiasis: Prevention, assessment and management guidelines

Boggild AK^1,2,3, Libman M⁴, Greenaway C⁵, McCarthy AE⁶, on behalf of the Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT)*

Affiliations

¹ Tropical Disease Unit, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON

² Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON

³ Public Health Ontario Laboratories, Toronto, ON

⁴ J. D. MacLean Centre for Tropical Disease, Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Microbiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC

⁵ Jewish General Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Montréal, QC

⁶ Tropical Medicine and International Health Clinic, Division of Infectious Disease, Ottawa Hospital General Campus, Ottawa, ON

Correspondence

catmat.secretariat@phac-aspc.gc.ca

Suggested citation

Boggild AK, Libman M, Greenaway C, McCarthy AE, on behalf of the Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT). CATMAT statement on disseminated strongyloidiasis: Prevention, assessment and management guidelines. Can Comm Dis Rep 2016;42:12-19. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v42i01a03

Abstract

Background: Strongyloides stercoralis is a parasitic nematode found in humans, with a higher prevalence in tropical and sub-tropical regions worldwide. If untreated, the infection can progress to disseminated strongyloidiasis, a critical illness which may be fatal.

Objective: To provide clinical guidance on the prevention, assessment and management of disseminated strongyloidiasis.

Methods: A literature review was conducted to evaluate the current evidence and to identify any systematic reviews, case reports, guidelines and peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed medical literature. The Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) assembled a working group to develop this statement, which was then critically reviewed and approved by all CATMAT members.

Recommendations: CATMAT recommends that screening for strongyloidiasis should be considered for individuals with epidemiologic risk and/or co-morbidities that place them at risk for Strongyloides hyperinfection and dissemination. Those at highest risk of hyperinfection and dissemination are individuals born in a Strongyloides-endemic area who undergo iatrogenic immunosuppression or have intercurrent human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV-1) infection. Diagnosis of strongyloidiasis is based on serologic testing and/or examination of stools and other clinical specimens for larvae. Referral to a tropical medicine specialist with expertise in the management of strongyloidiasis is recommended for suspected and confirmed cases. A diagnosis and treatment algorithm for strongyloidiasis has been developed as a reference tool.

Conclusion: Strongyloidiasis is relatively widespread in the global migrant population and screening for the disease should be based on an individual risk assessment. A practical tool for the clinician to use in the prevention, assessment and management of disseminated strongyloidiasis in Canada is now available.

Preamble

The Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) provides the Public Health Agency of Canada with ongoing and timely medical, scientific and public health advice relating to tropical infectious disease and health risks associated with international travel. The Agency acknowledges that the advice and recommendations set out in this statement are based upon the best current available scientific knowledge and medical practices and is disseminating this document for information purposes to both travellers and the medical community caring for travellers.

Persons administering or using drugs, vaccines or other products should also be aware of the contents of the product monograph(s) or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use. Recommendations for use and other information set out herein may differ from that set out in the product monograph(s) or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use by the licensed manufacturer(s). Manufacturers have sought approval and provided evidence as to the safety and efficacy of their products only when used in accordance with the product monographs or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use.

Introduction

Strongyloidiasis is a disease caused by a nematode (i.e., a roundworm), which is present mainly in tropical and sub-tropical regions, but also in temperate climates. Precise data on prevalence are unknown in endemic countries; however, it is estimated that 30-100 million people are infected worldwide^{Footnote 1} . Most people who are infected with Strongyloides are asymptomatic and unaware of their infection; however, people who are immunosuppressed are at risk of developing the severe form of disseminated strongyloidiasis which, if untreated, can lead to potentially fatal illness^{Footnote 2} . Although strongyloidiasis has traditionally been considered a tropical disease, increased worldwide travel and immigration have led to an increased number of cases seeking medical care in Canada.

The objectives of this statement are to:

Raise awareness of disseminated strongyloidiasis among clinicians who may encounter these cases (including front-line clinicians such as emergency room physicians, infectious diseases specialists, rheumatologists, dermatologists, gastroenterologists, oncologists, intensivists and transplant teams).
Assist clinicians in the prevention, assessment and management of disseminated strongyloidiasis.

Methods

This statement was created after CATMAT identified a need to inform Canadian clinicians about disseminated strongyloidiasis. A CATMAT working group was assembled and a member was elected to lead the statement development. The available literature was assessed for systematic reviews, guidelines, case reports and peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed medical literature. Based on the evidence compiled as well as expert opinion, a diagnosis and treatment algorithm for strongyloidiasis was designed as a reference tool for clinicians in Canada. The statement was then critically reviewed and approved by all CATMAT members.

Epidemiology

Strongyloides stercoralis is a parasitic nematode of humans, which is found throughout the tropics and sub-tropics worldwide. High prevalence of infection is found focally in the Caribbean, in West and East Africa and particularly Southeast Asia ^{Footnote 3}. Data support that anywhere between 10% to 40% of the population in tropical and sub-tropical regions are affected by strongyloidiasis, with rates as high as 60% in countries with ecologies and socioeconomic factors permissive to the transmission of S. stercoralis ^{Footnote 3}. A Canadian study of refugees documented a 77% seroprevalence among refugees from Cambodia and a 12% seroprevalence among refugees from Vietnam ^{Footnote 4}. Furthermore, strongyloidiasis was the fifth most common diagnosis among 1,321 ill new immigrants presenting for care at a Canadian Travel Medicine Network (CanTravNet) site over a three-year period ^{Footnote 5}^{Footnote 6}. Given that 6.8 million Canadians are foreign-born, with approximately 85% emigrating from regions endemic for strongyloidiasis ^{Footnote 7} a substantial proportion of the immigrant and refugee population of Canada is at risk for strongyloidiasis. Asia continues to be the largest source region for immigrants to Canada, with the Philippines, China and India serving as the top single source countries ^{Footnote 7}. Immigrant populations from Africa, the Caribbean, Central and South America are increasing over time as well ^{Footnote 7}.

In Canada, approximately 2.5-million individuals are estimated to have simple intestinal strongyloidiasis, assuming a source country prevalence of 40% ^{Footnote 3}. This estimate excludes travel-acquired strongyloidiasis, which is expected to account for a minority of cases in Canada. However, it is important to recognize that even short-term travel to highly endemic areas may be associated with acquisition of strongyloidiasis ^{Footnote 8}^{Footnote 9}^{Footnote 10}.

It is difficult to estimate the proportion of Canadian immigrants and refugees who are at risk of developing disseminated strongyloidiasis, such as individuals who require iatrogenic immunosuppression or have HTLV-1 co-infection.

Pathogenesis

Strongyloidiasis is acquired when infectious larvae, found in sand or soil, penetrate intact human skin and after an obligatory tissue migration phase, mature into adults in the small bowel. Unlike other parasitic helminths, Strongyloides has an indefinite lifespan in the human host and due to an autoinfection cycle whereby infective stage larvae re-penetrate host skin or bowel, clinical disease is a lifelong risk unless treated.

Clinical features

Strongyloides infection may cause a spectrum of illness ranging from asymptomatic eosinophilia to gastrointestinal symptoms to accelerated autoinfection (or "hyperinfection syndrome") to fulminant and fatal disseminated disease. Immune suppression such as that which occurs in the setting of prolonged corticosteroid therapy, HTLV-1 infection, or hematologic malignancy, is a risk factor for disseminated strongyloidiasis ^{Footnote 11}^{Footnote 12}^{Footnote 13}^{Footnote 14}, an entity documented to carry a mortality rate in excess of 85% ^{Footnote 15}^{Footnote 16}. The exact mechanisms for immunologic control of this infection are unclear.

Diagnosis and screening

The Canadian Consortium on Refugee and Immigrant Health (CCRIH) has recently recommended Strongyloides screening only for refugees from Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa ^{Footnote 17}. Broader-based screening was not recommended as there are little data on the prevalence of strongyloidiasis in immigrant populations and serologic screening is not easily or rapidly available in many parts of Canada. It has been our collective clinical experience, however, that strongyloidiasis is widespread in the global migrant population and screening should be based on a risk assessment, taking into account the risk of exposure to Strongyloides, the risk of disseminated disease and the presenting clinical syndrome (including asymptomatic persons who are planned to undergo iatrogenic immune suppression). This is supported by a case series in Toronto that documented ten cases of disseminated strongyloidiasis over a seven-month period, all of which occurred in immigrants to Canada, originating from Southeast Asia, the Caribbean, South America or Italy ^{Footnote 11}. Collectively, members of CATMAT have contributed to the care of patients with strongyloidiasis arising from travel to or residence in the Mediterranean, all parts of Africa, the Caribbean and Latin America, South Asia including the Indian sub-continent and the very high-risk Southeast Asia. Thus, we recommend careful consideration of epidemiologic risk as outlined below in order to inform screening decisions.

Due to the low sensitivity of stool examination for ova and parasites (O&P) arising from low larval burden and intermittent shedding in the stool, serologic testing is the diagnostic method of choice in the patient suspected to have simple intestinal strongyloidiasis.

It is important to note that sensitivity of serology may be reduced in the patient with immunosuppression, especially due to HTLV-1 infection or hematologic malignancy and associated chemotherapy ^{Footnote 18}^{Footnote 19}. These individuals are also at risk of developing disseminated strongyloidiasis and screening should generally involve both serologic and stool testing as outlined below. A stool O&P sample that is positive for Strongyloides larvae should prompt screening for HTLV-1 infection and referral to a specialist in tropical medicine with expertise in the management of strongyloidiasis. Physician members of the Canadian Malaria Network are available to provide advice in such cases ^{Footnote 20}.

Treatment

The drug of choice for treatment of simple intestinal and asymptomatic strongyloidiasis is ivermectin ^{Footnote 15}^{Footnote 21} given in two doses. Persons born or with prolonged residence in nations of the rainforest area of central Africa (e.g., Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Central African Republic, Congo and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, as well as southern areas of Nigeria, Chad, South Sudan and northern Angola) should have high microfilaremic loiasis excluded prior to administration of ivermectin. This should be done by daytime blood film examination for microfilaria of Loa loa.

For Strongyloides hyperinfection or dissemination syndrome, CATMAT recommends dual-therapy with ivermectin and albendazole as outlined below, which is based on case report data ^{Footnote 11}^{Footnote 22}^{Footnote 23}^{Footnote 24}^{Footnote 25}, expert opinion and the clinical experience of CATMAT members. Clinical specimens, including sputum and stool, should be rechecked periodically during the course of treatment of Strongyloides hyperinfection or dissemination to ensure clearance of larvae.

In order to prevent the development of disseminated strongyloidiasis, patients at risk for treatment failure or complications, such as those with HTLV-1 or Loa loa co-infection, should be referred to a tropical medicine specialist with expertise in the management of such infections. There is no evidence to support that a "test and treat" strategy is superior or more cost-effective compared to empiric administration of ivermectin to at-risk individuals about to undergo immune suppression ^{Footnote 26}. As access to ivermectin is limited in Canada, CATMAT recommends that empiric treatment be reserved for individuals whose planned immune suppression cannot await diagnostic testing, as outlined in Step 3 of the diagnosis and treatment algorithm below.

Any patient with disseminated strongyloidiasis should also receive empiric treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics to cover polymicrobial sepsis, a common complication of the hyperinfection syndrome. Both albendazole and ivermectin are pregnancy category C agents. In a pregnant person with Strongyloides hyperinfection or dissemination, the benefits of treatment likely outweigh the risks due to the life-threatening nature of disseminated strongyloidiasis. Ivermectin and albendazole are only available in Canada through the Special Access Programme of Health Canada ^{Footnote 27}. Applications to the program typically have a one-week turnaround time, although emergency use, same-day requests may be made by telephone.

Infection control issues

Patients with disseminated strongyloidiasis should be managed in contact precautions due to the risk of infectious filariform larvae being shed in effluents such as stool, urine, sputum and endotracheal aspirates. Most of these patients are critically unwell and require intensive nursing and medical care, thus precautions to prevent nosocomial transmission to health care workers is important. However, it must be noted that nosocomial transmission is a theoretical risk that has not been well documented in the literature ^{Footnote 28}^{Footnote 29}.

Contact precautions are also recommended for laboratory workers, due to the potential risk of encountering infectious filariform larvae, particularly in cultures of stool or sputum that have been sent to the laboratory to exclude bacterial infection. Agar plates of specimens from patients with disseminated strongyloidiasis should be handled with gloves and sealed with Parafilm tape. Filariform larvae of other nematode helminths are susceptible to 70% ethanol for 10 minutes, 0.5% Dettol^® for 20 minutes and chlorinated hydrocarbons (tetrachloroethylene) ^{Footnote 30}. Filariform larvae can also be inactivated by water heated above 80°C ^{Footnote 30}. Household contacts of patients with disseminated strongyloidiasis or Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome should be screened for strongyloidiasis serologically and by stool examination in order to identify person-to-person transmission.

Diagnosis and treatment algorithm for strongyloidiasis - Steps 1-4

Note to reader: All steps are to be completed sequentially, as Step 3 requires input from Steps 1 and 2.

Step 1: Define risk category for disseminated strongyloidiasis based on epidemiologic and clinical factors
*Epidemiologic risk category for Strongyloides* exposure/Infection**	Clinical risk factor for disseminated Strongyloides
	HTLV-1^{Table 1 footnote 1} infection Glucocorticoid^{Table 1 footnote 2} therapy Immunomodulatory agent^{Table 1 footnote 3} Hematologic malignancy	No known defects in cell mediated immunity
Birth or residence or long-term travel^{Table 1 footnote 4} in Southeast Asia, Oceania, Sub-Saharan Africa, South America, Caribbean	High	Moderate
Birth or residence or long-term travel^{Table 1 footnote 4} in Mediterranean countries, Middle East, North Africa, Indian sub-continent, Asia	Moderate	Low
Birth or residence or long-term travel^{Table 1 footnote 4} in Australia, North America^{Table 1 footnote 5} or Western Europe	Very low	Very low
Table 1 footnote 1 HTLV-1=Human T-lymphotropic virus Return to Table 1 footnote 1 Referrer Table 1 footnote 2 Equivalent to 20 mg/day of prednisone for ≥2 weeks. Return to Table 1 footnote 2 Referrer Table 1 footnote 3 Includes: alkylating agents, antimetabolites, immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents used in the management of solid-organ transplant and multiple sclerosis, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), Interleokin 1 (IL-1) and adhesion blocking agents, lymphocyte depleting agents. Return to Table 1 footnote 3 Referrer Table 1 footnote 4 Defined as cumulative six-month exposure in rural or beach areas, or contact of skin with sand or soil in a risk area even during shorter-term travel ^, ^, . If significant re-exposure accumulates, consider re-screening if initially negative. Return to Table 1 first footnote 4 Referrer Table 1 footnote 5 Areas of North America that may be higher than low risk include Florida, Kentucky and Virginia. Aboriginal Australians are at elevated risk of strongyloidiasis. Return to Table 1 footnote 5 Referrer

Step 2: Define suspected clinical syndrome
Suspected clinical syndrome	Appropriate diagnostic test	Appropriate diagnostic specimen
Asymptomatic ± eosinophilia (This would include asymptomatic individuals undergoing planned immune suppression.) (Very low risk)	Serology Stool ova and parasites (O&P) examination	Serum SAF^{Table 1 footnote 4}-preserved stool specimen
Simple intestinal strongyloidiasis^{Table 2 footnote 1}(Low risk)	Serology Stool O&P examination	Serum SAF-preserved stool specimen
Mild hyperinfection syndrome^{Table 2 footnote 2} (Moderate risk)	Serology Stool O&P examination Sputum O&P examination Agar plate culture	Serum SAF-preserved stool specimen Fresh sputum in sterile container Fresh stool/sputum for agar plate culture
Disseminated strongyloidiasis^{Table 2 footnote 3} (High risk)	Serology Stool O&P examination Sputum O&P examination Urine O&P examination CSF^{Table 1 footnote 5} O&P examination Tissue O&P examination Agar plate culture	Serum SAF-preserved stool specimen Fresh sputum in sterile container Urine in sterile container CSF in sterile container Tissue, paraffin-embedded or unprocessed Any fresh specimen as above for agar plate culture
Table 2 footnote 1 Characterized by weight loss, abdominal discomfort and loose stools, with or without eosinophilia. Return to Table 2 footnote 1 Referrer Table 2 footnote 2 Symptoms of intestinal strongyloidiasis plus respiratory symptoms (cough, wheezing, dyspnea) with or without immunosuppression. (corticosteroids, HTLV-1 infection, malignancy, non-steroidal immunomodulating agents) and absence of signs of systemic toxicity or sepsis; all persons shedding larvae of Strongyloides should be screened for intercurrent HTLV-1 infection. Return to Table 2 footnote 2 Referrer Table 2 footnote 3 Severe clinical syndrome characterized by Gram-negative or polymicrobial sepsis and/or meningitis, with evidence of end-organ failure, including acute renal failure, acute respiratory distress, impaired consciousness, coma. Return to Table 2 footnote 3 Referrer Table 2 footnote 4 SAF = Sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin Return to Table 2 footnote 4 Referrer Table 2 footnote 5 CSF = Cerebrospinal fluid Return to Table 2 footnote 5 Referrer

Step 3: Suggested diagnostic and empiric management approach based on identified risk category (Step 1) and clinical syndrome (Step 2)
Risk category (as per Step 1)	Suspected clinical syndrome (as per Step 2)
Risk category (as per Step 1)	Asymptomatic ± eosinophilia^{Table 3 footnote 1}	Simple intestinal strongyloidiasis	Mild hyperinfection syndrome	Disseminated strongyloidiasis
High	Send appropriate specimens for diagnostic testing^{Table 3 footnote 2} (Moderate risk)	Empiric treatment while awaiting diagnostic testing (High risk)	Empiric treatment while awaiting diagnostic testing (High risk)	Empiric treatment while awaiting diagnostic testing (High risk)
Moderate	Send appropriate specimens for diagnostic testing (Moderate risk)	Send appropriate specimens for diagnostic testing (Moderate risk)	Empiric treatment while awaiting diagnostic testing (High risk)	Empiric treatment while awaiting diagnostic testing (High risk)
Low	Send appropriate specimens for diagnostic testing (Low risk)	Send appropriate specimens for diagnostic testing (Low risk)	Send appropriate specimens for diagnostic testing (Low risk)	Send appropriate specimens for diagnostic testing (Low risk)
Very low	Screening not recommended. Consider alternate diagnosis (Very low risk)	Screening not recommended. Consider alternate diagnosis (Very low risk)	Send appropriate specimens for diagnostic testing (Very low risk)	Send appropriate specimens for diagnostic testing (Very low risk)
Table 3 footnote 1 This includes asymptomatic individuals undergoing planned immune suppression. Return to Table 3 footnote 1 Referrer Table 3 footnote 2 In the rare circumstance where the patient is deemed high risk for strongyloidiasis and immunosuppression cannot await definitive diagnostic testing, we recommend empiric treatment with two doses of ivermectin as outlined in Step 4 below. Return to Table 3 footnote 2 Referrer

Step 4: Treat strongyloidiasis according to clinical syndrome and diagnostic results
Clinical syndrome	Diagnostic confirmation	Adult management	Pediatric management
Asymptomatic ± eosinophilia (including asymptomatic individuals undergoing planned immune suppression) (Very low risk)	Serology Stool ova and parasites (O&P) examination for larvae	Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po once daily × 2 doses on day 1 and 2, or 14-days apart^{Table 4 footnote 1}	Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po once daily × 2 doses on day 1 and 2, or 14-days apart^{Table 4 footnote 1}
Simple intestinal strongyloidiasis^{Table 4 footnote 2}(Low risk)	Serology Stool O&P examination for larvae	Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po once daily × 2 doses on day 1 and 2, or 14-days apart^{Table 4 footnote 1}	Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po once daily × 2 doses on day 1 and 2, or 14-days apart^{Table 4 footnote 1}
Mild hyperinfection syndrome^{Table 4 footnote 3}(Moderate risk)	Serology Stool O&P Sputum O&P examination for larvae	Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po once daily × 2 doses on day 1 and 2, or 14-days apart^{Table 1 footnote 1} PLUS Albendazole 400 mg po BID × 7 days OR, Monotherapy: Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po once daily × 7 days	Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po once daily × 2 doses on day 1 and 2, or 14-days apart^{Table 4 footnote 1} PLUS Albendazole 400 mg po BID × 7 days OR, Monotherapy: Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po once daily × 7 days
Disseminated strongyloidiasis ^{Table 4 footnote 4}^{Table 1 footnote 5}(High risk)	Serology Stool O&P examination for larvae Sputum O&P examination for larvae Urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or other body fluid or tissue examination for larvae.	Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po or sc^{Table 4 footnote 6} once daily PLUS Albendazole 400 mg po BID until cessation of larval shedding and clinical improvement	Ivermectin 200 µg/kg/day po or sc^{Table 4 footnote 6} once daily PLUS Albendazole 400 mg po BID until cessation of larval shedding and clinical improvement
Table 4 footnote 1 A 14-day dosing interval is preferred due to the risk of prepatent infection arising from autoinfection . Return to Table 4 footnote 1 Referrer Table 4 footnote 2 Characterized by weight loss, abdominal discomfort and loose stools, with or without eosinophilia. Return to Table 4 footnote 2 Referrer Table 4 footnote 3 Symptoms of intestinal strongyloidiasis plus respiratory symptoms (cough, wheezing, dyspnea) with or without immunosuppression (corticosteroids, HTLV-1 infection, malignancy, non-steroidal immunomodulating agents) and absence of signs of systemic toxicity or sepsis; all persons shedding larvae of Strongyloides should be screened for intercurrent HTLV-1 infection. Return to Table 4 footnote 3 Referrer Table 4 footnote 4 Severe clinical syndrome characterized by Gram-negative or polymicrobial sepsis and/or meningitis, with evidence of end-organ failure, including acute renal failure, acute respiratory distress, impaired consciousness, coma. Return to Table 4 footnote 4 Referrer Table 4 footnote 5 Patients with disseminated strongyloidiasis should also receive empiric coverage of polymicrobial sepsis with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Return to Table 4 footnote 5 Referrer Table 4 footnote 6 Available only as a veterinary formulation; use in humans is off-label and not Health Canada approved ^{Footnote 25}^{Footnote 31}^{Footnote 32}^{Footnote 33} Return to Table 4 footnote 6 Referrer

Conclusion

Strongyloidiasis is relatively widespread in the global migrant population. Screening for the disease should be based on an individual risk assessment, taking into account the risk of exposure to Strongyloides, the risk of disseminated disease and the presenting clinical syndrome (which may include asymptomatic persons who are planned to undergo iatrogenic immune suppression). This statement summarizes the available relevant information on strongyloidiasis and provides a practical tool for the clinician to use in the prevention, assessment and management of disseminated strongyloidiasis in Canada.

Key points

Screening for strongyloidiasis should be considered for individuals with epidemiologic risk and/or co-morbidities that place them at risk for Strongyloides hyperinfection and dissemination. Those at highest risk of hyperinfection and dissemination are individuals born in a Strongyloides-endemic area who undergo iatrogenic immunosuppression, or have intercurrent HTLV-1 infection.
Diagnosis of strongyloidiasis rests on serologic testing and/or examination of stools and other clinical specimens for larvae. Serology is generally highly sensitive, while stool examination is highly specific.
Performance characteristics of diagnostic tests may be altered by immune suppression and co-infections such as HTLV-1, in that stool examination sensitivity may improve, while sensitivity of serology may decline.
Referral to a tropical medicine specialist with expertise in the management of strongyloidiasis is recommended for any patient with suspected or confirmed disseminated strongyloidiasis and for patients with both Strongyloides and HTLV-1 or Loa loa infections.

Acknowledgements

CATMAT acknowledges and appreciates the contribution of Mihaela Gheorghe.

CATMAT members: McCarthy A (Chair), Boggild A, Brophy J, Bui Y, Crockett M, Greenaway C, Libman M, Teitelbaum P and Vaughan S.

Liaison members: Audcent T (Canadian Paediatric Society), Gershman M (United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and Pernica J (Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada).

Ex officio members: Marion D (Canadian Forces Health Services Centre, Department of National Defence), McDonald P (Division of Anti-Infective Drugs, Health Canada), Schofield S (Pest Management Entomology, Department of National Defence) and Tepper M (Directorate of Force Health Protection, Department of National Defence).

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding

This work was supported by the Public Health Agency of Canada.

References

Footnote 1

World Health Organization.Intestinal Worms: Strongyloidiasis. Geneva: WHO; 2015. http://www.who.int/intestinal_worms/epidemiology/strongyloidiasis/en.

Return to footnote 1 Referrer

Footnote 2

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Parasites - Strongyloides. Epidemiology and risk factors. Atlanta GA: CDC; 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/strongyloides/epi.html.

Return to footnote 2 Referrer

Footnote 3

Schär F, Trostdorf U, Giardina F, Khieu V, Muth S, Marti H, et al. Strongyloides stercoralis: Global distribution and risk factors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(7):e2288.

Return to first footnote 3 Referrer

Footnote 4

Gyorkos TW, Genta RM, Viens P, MacLean JD. Seroepidemiology of Strongyloides infection in the Southeast Asian refugee population in Canada. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:257-64.

Return to footnote 4 Referrer

Footnote 5

Boggild AK, Geduld J, Libman M, McCarthy A, Vincelette J, Ghesquiere W, Hajek J, Kuhn S, Freedman DO, Kain KC. Travel-acquired infections in Canada: CanTravNet 2011 - 2012. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2014;40(16):313-325.

Return to footnote 5 Referrer

Footnote 6

Boggild AK, Geduld J, Libman M, Ward B, McCarthy A, Doyle P, Ghesquiere W, Vincelette J, Kuhn S, Freedman DO, Kain KC. Travel-acquired infections and illnesses in Canadians: Surveillance report from CanTravNet surveillance data, 2009 - 2011. Open Med. 2014;8(1):e20-e32.

Return to footnote 6 Referrer

Footnote 7

Statistics Canada. Immigration and ethnocultural diversity in Canada. National Household Survey, 2011. Ottawa ON: Minister of Industry; 2015. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-010-x/99-010-x2011001-eng.pdf.

Return to first footnote 7 Referrer

Footnote 8

Baaten GG, Sonder GJ, van Gool T, et al. Travel-related schistosomiasis, strongyloidiasis, filariasis, and toxocariasis: The risk of infection and the diagnostic relevance of blood eosinophilia. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:84.

Return to footnote 8 Referrer

Footnote 9

Angheben A, Mistretta M, Gobbo M, Bonafini S, Iacovazzi T, Sepe A, Gobbi F, Marocco S, Rossanese A, Bisoffi Z. Acute strongyloidiasis in Italian tourists returning from Southeast Asia. J Travel Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):138-40.

Return to footnote 9 Referrer

Footnote 10

Bailey KE, Danylo A, Boggild AK. Chronic larva currens following tourist travel to the Gambia and Southeast Asia over 20 years ago. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015;19(4):412-5.

Return to footnote 10 Referrer

Footnote 11

Lim S, Katz K, Kradjen S, Fuksa M, Keystone JS, Kain KC. Complicated and fatal Strongyloides infection in Canadians: Risk factors, diagnosis, and management. CMAJ. 2004;171(5):479-84.

Return to first footnote 11 Referrer

Footnote 12

Rogers WA Jr, Nelson B. Strongyloidiasis and malignant lymphoma "opportunistic infection" by a nematode. JAMA. 1966;195:685-7.

Return to footnote 12 Referrer

Footnote 13

Willis AJP, Nwokolo C. Steroid therapy and strongyloidiasis. Lancet. 1966;1:1396-8.

Return to footnote 13 Referrer

Footnote 14

Cruz R, Reboucas G, Rocha H. Fatal strongyloidiasis in patients receiving corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 1966;275:1093-6.

Return to footnote 14 Referrer

Footnote 15

Suputtamongkol Y, Premasathian N, Bhumimuang K, Waywa D, Nilganuwong S, Karuphong E, et al. Efficacy and safety of single and double doses of ivermectin versus seven-day high dose albendazole for chronic strongyloidiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(5):e1044.

Return to footnote 15 Referrer

Footnote 16

Igra-Siegman Y, Kapila R, Sen P, Kaminski ZC, Louria DB. Syndrome of hyperinfection with Strongyloides stercoralis. Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3:397-407.

Return to footnote 16 Referrer

Footnote 17

Pottie K, Greenaway C, Feightner J, Welch V, Swinkels H, Rashid M, et al. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J. 2011;183(12):E824-E925.

Return to footnote 17 Referrer

Footnote 18

Porto AF, Oliveira Filho J, Neva FA, Orge G, Alcântara L, Gam A, Carvalho EM. Influence of human T-cell lymphocytotropic virus type 1 infection on serologic and skin tests for strongyloidiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Nov;65(5):610-3.

Return to footnote 18 Referrer

Footnote 19

Schaffel R, Nucci M, Carvalho E, Braga M, Almeida L, Portugal R, Pulcheri W. The value of an immunoenzymatic test (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for the diagnosis of strongyloidiasis in patients immunosuppressed by hematologic malignancies. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Oct;65(4):346-50.

Return to footnote 19 Referrer

Footnote 20

Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Malaria Network (CMN). http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/tmp-pmv/quinine/index-eng.php.

Return to footnote 20 Referrer

Footnote 21

Meunnig P, Pallin D, Challah C, Khan K. The cost-effectiveness of ivermectin vs. albendazole in the presumptive treatment of strongyloidiasis in immigrants to the United States. Epidemiol Infect. 2004;132:1055-1063.

Return to footnote 21 Referrer

Footnote 22

Balagopal A, Mills L, Shah A, Subramanian A. Detection and treatment of Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome following lung transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2009;11:149-154.

Return to footnote 22 Referrer

Footnote 23

Altintop L, Cakar B, Hokelek M, Bektas A, Yildiz L, Karaoglanoglu M. Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and bronchial asthma: A case report. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2010;9:27.

Return to footnote 23 Referrer

Footnote 24

Hasan A, Le M, Pasko J, Ravin KA, Clauss H, Hasz R, et al. Transmission of Strongyloides stercoralis through transplantation of solid organs - Pennsylvania, 2012. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(14):264-266.

Return to footnote 24 Referrer

Footnote 25

Chiodini PL, Reid AJC, Wiselka MJ, Firmin R, Foweraker J. Parenteral ivermectin in Strongyloides hyperinfection. Lancet. 2000;355:43-44.

Return to first footnote 25 Referrer

Footnote 26

Roxby AC, Gottlieb GS, Limaye AP. Strongyloidiasis in transplant patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1411-1423.

Return to footnote 26 Referrer

Footnote 27

Health Canada. Guidance document for industry and practitioners: Special access programme for drugs. Ottawa ON: Health Canada; 2013. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/acces/sapg3_pasg3-eng.pdf.

Return to footnote 27 Referrer

Footnote 28

Maraha B, Buiting AGM, Hol C, Pelgrom R, Blotkamp C, Polderman AM. The risk of Strongyloides stercoralis transmission from patients with disseminated strongyloidiasis to the medical staff. J Hosp Infect. 2001;49:222-224.

Return to footnote 28 Referrer

Footnote 29

Hauber HP, Galle J, Chiodini PL, Rupp J, Birke R, Vollmer E, Zabel P, Lange C. Fatal outcome of a hyperinfection syndrome despite successful eradication of Strongyloides with subcutaneous ivermectin. Infect. 2005;33(5/6):383-386.

Return to footnote 29 Referrer

Footnote 30

Public Health Agency of Canada. Ancylostoma duodenale. Pathogen safety data sheet - infectious substances. Ottawa ON: PHAC; 2012. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/lab-bio/res/psds-ftss/ancylostoma-duodenale-eng.php.

Return to first footnote 30 Referrer

Footnote 31

Turner SA, Maclean JD, Fleckenstein L, Greenaway C. Parenteral administration of ivermectin in a patient with disseminated strongyloidiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73(5):911-914.

Return to footnote 31 Referrer

Footnote 32

Leung V, Al-Rawahi GN, Grant J, Fleckenstein L, Bowie W. Case report: Failure of subcutaneous ivermectin in treating Strongyloides hyperinfection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79(6):853-855.

Return to footnote 32 Referrer

Footnote 33

Salluh JIF, Feres GA, Velasco E, Holanda GS, Toscano L, Soares M. Successful use of parenteral ivermectin in an immunosuppressed patient with disseminated strongyloidiasis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1292.

Return to footnote 33 Referrer

Table of contents

Page details

Date modified:: 2016-01-07

Language selection

Search