|
Volume 27-05
1 March 2001
[Table
of Contents]
|
|
RESPIRATORY VIRUS SURVEILLANCE
FLUWATCH PROJECT UPDATE
Introduction
Canada's national influenza surveillance system, the FluWatch program,
is now in it's fifth year. The program collects data on influenza-like
illness (ILI) and monitors the types of influenza virus circulating in
the population to provide a national picture of influenza activity. FluWatch
also reports institutional outbreaks and contributes to international
surveillance activities. This article provides a brief summary of the
current season from 1 October, 2000 up to and including 27 January, 2001.
Methods
FluWatch reports include data and information from four main sources:
(1) laboratory reports of positive influenza tests in Canada; (2) sentinel
physician reporting of ILI; (3) provincial/territorial assessment of influenza
activity levels based on various indicators, including laboratory surveillance,
ILI reporting, outbreaks and other community indicators; (4) international
surveillance system reports of influenza activity (CDC, European Influenza
Surveillance System [EISS], WHO).
Results
Across Canada, 28 laboratories submit respiratory virus detection data
on a weekly basis to the Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and
Control (CIDPC). Since 27 August, 2000, CIDPC has received reports on
23,552 tests for influenza, of which 1,372 (5.8%) tested positive for
influenza viruses: 191 (13.9%) for influenza A and 1181 (86.1%) for influenza
B. The provincial distribution of positive tests is as follows: Newfoundland
(2), Prince Edward Island (0), Nova Scotia (37), New Brunswick (13), Quebec
(34), Ontario (60), Manitoba (69), Saskatchewan (432), Alberta (521) and
British Columbia (204). Influenza B has been isolated in all but one province
and influenza A in all but the Atlantic provinces. To-date, 140 influenza
isolates have been characterised by the National Microbiology Laboratory:
36 were A/New Caledonia/20/99-like (H1N1); two were A/Panama/2007/99-like,
and; 102 were B/Yamanashi/166/98-like. All of the strains characterised
to date are covered by the 2000-2001 vaccine.
Weekly ILI rates, reported through the sentinel system, have remained
at or below baseline since the beginning of the season. Figure
1 shows the Canadian age-standardized, census-division weighted ILI
rates for the current season compared to the mean rate with 95% confidence
intervals for the previous 4 years of the FluWatch program. Figure
2 shows the cumulative ILI rates ([
reported ILI cases/
reported patient visits] × 1,000) for each province since 1 October,
2000. Manitoba and the North West Territories have the highest cumulative
ILI rates this season, while Prince Edward Island, British Columbia and
Alberta have the lowest cumulative ILI rates. Up to end of 2000, the season
had been relatively mild with mostly sporadic activity occurring across
Canada and only limited localised activity in southern Alberta and Saskatchewan
during late December. The first widespread influenza activity occurred
in the Yukon, between 24 December, 2000 and 6 January, 2001 and in Saskatchewan
between 24 December, 2000 and 20 January, 2001. By 27 January (week four),
widespread activity was limited to one region (Prince Edward Island).
Figure 3 shows the number of influenza surveillance
regions reporting localized and widespread influenza activity by report
week.
|
| |
|
The USA is also experiencing a fairly mild season. The proportion of
overall patient visits for ILI has remained within baseline at 1% to 3%
and the proportion of deaths due to pneumonia and influenza (7.9%) has
remained below the epidemic threshold throughout the current season. Since
the beginning of October, 2000, a total of 2,239 influenza isolates have
been reported; 1,640 (73%) were influenza A (97% H1N1 and 3% H3N2) and
599 (27%) were influenza B. Influenza A viruses have predominated in six
regions (East North Central, Mountain, New England, South Atlantic, West
North Central, and West South Central) whereas influenza B viruses have
predominated in two regions (Mid-Atlantic and Pacific). One other region
(East South Central) has had approximately equal numbers of influenza
A and B isolates. Of the 153 influenza viruses that have been characterised
to date, 114 (74.5%) were influenza were A/New Caledonia/20/99-like (H1N1),
eight (5%) were A/Bayern/07/95-like (H1N1)*, 10 (6.5%) were A/Panama/2007/99-like
(H3N2) and 21 (14%) were influenza B/Beijing/184/93-like.
On a global level, the WHO reported regional influenza activity in Canada
and parts of Europe during the months of December, 2000 and January, 2001.
Widespread activity was first reported for the Eastern Mediterranean during
December, 2000. In the week of 21 to 26 January, 2001, widespread activity
was reported for Germany, Czech Republic and Slovak Republic. Of the viruses
sub-typed thus far, the predominant types have been influenza A (H1N1
predominates the characterized strains) in the United States and Europe
and influenza B in Canada(1-3).
FluWatch reports are published weekly (October to April) and can be accessed
through Health Canada's FluWatch website: <http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/fluwatch/index.html>.
Please note that the above graphs may change as late returns come in.
References
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza summary
update, Week ending January 27, 2001-Week 04. URL:
<http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/flu/weeklychoice.htm>.
-
World Health Organisation, FluNet. Isolates/activity, ILI activity,
21/01/01 to 27/01/01, World. URL: <http://www.who.int/GlobalAtlas/home.asp>.
-
European Influenza Surveillance System. Weekly Electronic Bulletin,
01/02/2001: Week 4, Issue Number 17. URL: <http://www.eiss.org/cgi-files/bulletin.cgi>.
Source: JF Macey, MA, MSc, Field Epidemiology Training
Program, Centre for Surveillance Coordination and Division of Respiratory
Diseases, Bureau of Infectious Diseases, B Winchester, BSc, MSc, SG Squires,
MSc, T Tam, MD, Division of Respiratory Diseases, P Zabchuk, Division
of Disease Surveillance, Bureau of Infectious Diseases, Centre for Infectious
Disease Prevention and Control, Ottawa; M Vanderkloot, Bureau of Operations
Planning and Policy, Strategic Policy Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario; Y Li, PhD, National Microbiology Laboratory,
Winnipeg, Manitoba.
* The CDC reports that although A/Bayern-like viruses
are antigenically distinct from the A/New Caledonia-like viruses, the
A/New Caledonia/20/99-like vaccine strain produces high titres of antibody
that cross-react with A/Bayern/07/95-like viruses(1).
[Previous]
[Table of Contents]
|