![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Canada Communicable Disease Report
Vol. 27 (ACS-3) 15 March 2001 An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) STATEMENT ON TRAVELLERS' DIARRHEA Adobe Downloadable Document
PREAMBLE The Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) provides Health Canada with ongoing and timely medical, scientific, and public-health advice relating to tropical infectious disease and health risks associated with international travel. Health Canada acknowledges that the advice and recommendations set out in this statement are based upon the best current available scientific knowledge and medical practices, and is disseminating this document for information purposes to both travellers and the medical community caring for travellers. Persons administering or using drugs, vaccines, or other products should also be aware of the contents of the product monograph(s) or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use. Recommendations for use and other information set out herein may differ from that set out in the product monograph(s) or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use by the licensed manufacturer(s). Manufacturers have sought approval and provided evidence as to the safety and efficacy of their products only when used in accordance with the product monographs or other similarly approved standards or instructions for use. INTRODUCTION Diarrhea is the most common medical problem affecting travellers
to developing countries(1). Episodes of travellers’ diarrhea usually
begin abruptly, either during travel or soon after returning home, and are
generally self-limited. The most important determinant of risk is the travel
destination and the type of travel (five-star accommodations vs. backpacking).
Although usually mild, travellers’ diarrhea can adversely affect the quality
of a vacation or the success of a business trip. Concern about the incidence
of diarrhea in high-risk destinations may also impose limitations on travellers’
itineraries. The estimated economic impact of travellers’ diarrhea is significant. EPIDEMIOLOGY Travellers’ diarrhea can be a debilitating illness, and may
be particularly difficult to manage in remote or unfamiliar surroundings.
Up to 50% of travellers from developed to developing countries can expect
to have at least one episode of acute diarrhea during a 2-week stay, with
20% being confined to bed for a day(2,3). The risk of travellers’
diarrhea is not uniform throughout the developing world. For example, in the
Caribbean, Eastern and Southern Europe the risk varies from 15% to 20% whereas
in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America it ranges from 20% to 50%(3).
Although travellers’ diarrhea can be caused by both food- and waterborne pathogens,
most cases are due to food contaminated with enterotoxigenic bacteria. Factors
that may be associated with a higher probability of acquiring travellers’
diarrhea include adventurous eating habits, gastric hypochlorhydria(4,5),
immunodeficiency diseases, and the relative lack of gut immunity seen in younger
individuals(1). FOOD Contaminated food is the common cause of travellers’ diarrhea,
and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), is most frequently associated
with foodborne transmission. However, recent outbreaks of ETEC on cruise ships
highlight the possibility of waterborne transmission as well(6).
There are numerous opportunities in developing countries for food to become
contaminated including the fertilization of crops with human fecal material,
inadequate storage and transport of food, unreliable refrigeration, lack of
pasteurization, and unhygienic food handling practices. No food group can
be regarded as “safe” and the sources of foodborne illness can be numerous
including poorly cooked meat, contaminated raw vegetables, or unpasteurized
dairy products. Even adequately cooked foods can become contaminated if allowed
to stand for several hours at ambient temperatures, since many such foods
are essentially ideal bacterial culture media. Flies may be important vectors
of some foodborne enteric pathogens. The highest risk food items include custards(7,8),
mousses(9), potato salads(10,11), hollandaise sauce(12),
mayonnaise(13), and seafood(14). Although eating food
purchased from street vendors can enhance cross-cultural experiences, the
inadequate sanitary facilities and poor refrigeration typical of such food
stalls carries an increased risk of travellers’ diarrhea(15). Even
compulsive peeling and washing of fruits and vegetables may not be a guarantee
of safety, since they are sometimes injected with contaminated water to increase
their weight and hence, their value. WATER Waterborne diarrheal illness usually results from the ingestion
of viruses and parasites in water contaminated by human or agricultural fecal
waste. The lesser importance of water as a cause of travellers’ diarrhea is
likely due to the relatively lower concentration of contaminating organisms
in liquid versus solid foods. Although commercially bottled water is generally
safe, the unscrupulous practice of selling tap water as “safe, purified, bottled
water” is not uncommon in some regions of the world. Carbonated beverages
are generally too acidic ETIOLOGY Bacterial pathogens, with incubation periods measured in days,
cause > 80% of cases of travellers’ diarrhea(20). The most commonly
isolated organisms include Escherichia coli, primarily enterotoxigenic
strains (ETEC), Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella species, and
Shigella species. A variety of other less commonly isolated bacteria
include Aeromonas, Plesiomonas, and Yersinia species
as well as non-cholera vibrios, and rarely Vibrio cholerae(21).
Clostridium difficile is an infrequent cause of travellers’ diarrhea
that must always be considered in those taking doxycycline for malaria prophylaxis
or using antibiotics for other reasons(22). Although rarely identified,
parasitic pathogens that can cause travellers’ diarrhea with incubation periods
of up to 1 to 2 weeks, include Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium
parvum, Cyclospora cayetanensis, Entamoeba histolytica and
rarely Microspora species, primarily Enterocytozoon bieneusi(23-25).
Viruses, notably Norwalk and rotavirus, can also cause travellers’ diarrhea,
sometimes with onset within hours of exposure(23). Certain etiologies have strong epidemiologic associations
such as ETEC in Latin America(26), Campylobacter jejuni
in Southeast Asia and North Africa(27), Vibrio cholerae
in India, Bangladesh, Ecuador, Peru, and Bali(28), Giardia lamblia
in mountainous areas of North America, Russia and Nepal(29), Cryptosporidium
parvum in Russia, and Cyclospora cayetanensis in Nepal(29).
Such information is important to consider when recommending antimicrobial
prophylaxis or empiric treatment of travellers’ diarrhea. Seasonality is also
an important factor; for example, cyclosporiasis is found primarily during
the summer months in Nepal and campylobacteriosis occurs more frequently in
North Africa and Mexico in winter months, whereas ETEC is a summer disease
in these countries. Resistance to antimicrobial agents is an increasingly common problem in enteric bacterial isolates from developing countries. Resistance to tetracyclines and sulfonamides is almost universal(30). Resistance to fluoroquinolones is rapidly increasing, especially among Campylobacter species isolated from Southeast Asia(31-33). PREVENTION Prevention strategies for travellers’ diarrhea include 1)
education about the ingestion of safe food and beverages, 2) water purification,
3) chemoprophylaxis with nonantibiotic drugs or antibiotics, and FOOD CHOICES The judicious choice of food and water with the adage to “boil
it, cook it, peel it, or forget it” seems reasonable, but may often not
be practical. Several studies have shown that few travellers are able to comply
with strict dietary recommendations and some evidence has recently revealed
no association between dietary mistakes and the incidence of travellers’ diarrhea(34).
On the other hand, common sense would dictate that avoidance of potentially
contaminated food and water should reduce exposure to large inocula of organisms.
As foodborne illness is more prevalent than waterborne disease, particular
attention should be given to the choice of foods. Foods that have been well
cooked, recently cooked, and served piping hot are best. Salad bars, raw vegetables,
fruits that cannot be easily cleaned (e.g., grapes, strawberries, raspberries),
custards, mousses, mayonnaise, hollandaise sauce, and raw seafood are best
avoided. Fruits and vegetables should be either freshly peeled or freshly
cooked. Non-bottled fruit and vegetable juices, which may be diluted with
contaminated water, should also be avoided. Raw lettuce, the main ingredient
of most salads, is nearly impossible to clean properly and should not be eaten.
Only pasteurized and properly refrigerated dairy products should be eaten.
Raw and incompletely cooked fish and meat should be avoided. In the Caribbean
and the South Pacific, care should also be taken with the ingestion of large
reef fish such as snapper, barracuda, grouper, jack, and moray eel which carry
the additional risk of Ciguatera poisoning(35,36). Ciguatera toxin
is heat stable and therefore not neutralized by cooking. FLUID CHOICES Safe beverages are readily available in developing countries
and include carbonated soft drinks, carbonated bottled water, bottled fruit
juices, alcoholic beverages without ice, and hot beverages such as tea and
coffee. Commercially carbonated beverages are safe by virtue of their bactericidal
acidic environment(16). Noncarbonated commercially bottled water
should be safe as long as the cap seal is intact. Beer is free of enteric
pathogens(17). Ice cubes should be regarded as potentially contaminated
and best avoided(18). Properly collected and stored rain water
is usually safe to drink. WATER PURIFICATION Water purification may be achieved by heat, filtration, or
chemical disinfection. Boiling is the most effective way of producing water
that is safe to drink. Simply bringing water to a boil, irrespective of altitude,
is sufficient to kill all of the common organisms that cause travellers’ diarrhea(37,38).
Small portable heater coils may be a practical way for travellers to boil
small quantities of water for tea or coffee. Alternatively, carrying a water
bottle along with a portable 0.5 - 1.0 litre traveller’s kettle with electrical
outlet and current flexibility, is another inexpensive way to ensure a constant
supply of purified water. If no other choices are available, tap water that
is too hot to touch should also be relatively safe to drink once it has cooled. Filters that exclude particles above a specified size (e.g., 0.2 microns) are effective against most bacteria and parasites, but do not protect against viral pathogens. Therefore, water filtration should, if possible, be followed by chemical decontamination with a halogen. Some water purification products combine a 0.2 micron filter with iodine-impregnated resins, although there is limited evidence to confirm their efficacy and they are expensive. Another purification method is the direct addition of a halogen such as iodine or chlorine. Adding iodine as a liquid or crystal to water rapidly eliminates bacterial, protozoal, and viral pathogens. Iodine treated water is often unpalatable, however the addition of orange juice crystals may improve the taste. Dehalogenation with vitamin C should be performed only after 30 minutes contact-time has elapsed. Chlorine, available as tablets or simply in commercial household bleach, is relatively ineffective against the cysts of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum(39-41). The choice of water purification method will vary according to the traveller’s itinerary and personal preferences. Travellers who are on long-term postings may prefer to boil their water as filters have finite life spans and chemically-treated water is often unpalatable. Most short-term travellers on business trips or resort holidays may prefer limiting themselves to commercially bottled beverages and portable, halogen-containing, water filters. CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS Chemoprophylaxis using bismuth subsalicylate and antimicrobials
has been shown to be effective in preventing travellers’ diarrhea(42,43).
However, important issues deserving consideration include cost, drug interactions,
drug side effects, antibiotic resistance, and alteration of normal bowel and
vaginal flora. Although the use of prophylactic antibiotics in travellers
can be cost-effective because of the expense incurred in changing travel plans(44),
other investigators have concluded that self-treatment options have a more
favourable cost:benefit ratio than antimicrobial prophylaxis except in selected
high risk travellers(45) (see Therapy section below). Furthermore,
when prescribing prophylactic antimicrobials, significant drug-induced adverse
events must be considered, including severe allergic reactions such as Stevens-Johnson
syndrome or anaphylaxis, as well as, photosensitivity reactions, candidal
vaginitis, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, and the emergence
of antibiotic-resistant flora. Prophylactic bismuth subsalicylate (Pepto-Bismol®)
has an efficacy of approximately 60% but must be administered four times daily(46)
(Table 1). Bismuth subsalicylate should be avoided by
persons with aspirin allergy, renal insufficiency, and gout, and by those
taking anticoagulants, probenecid, or methotrexate. Caution should be exercised
when using bismuth subsalicylate in children due to the potential risk of
Reye syndrome. Bismuth subsalicylate has not been approved for children <
2 years of age.
Antibiotic prophylaxis is typically administered once daily
(od) (Table 1), and although 70% - 95% efficacious(47-49),
it should only be considered in selected high risk short-term travellers such
as:
Prophylactic antibiotics or bismuth subsalicylate should only
be considered for short-term travel to a maximum of 3 weeks, with the possible
exception of HIV positive persons who may require long-term prophylaxis for
prolonged travel. Long-term travellers and those living in developing countries
gradually develop immunity to some enteropathogens (over 12 to 24 months)
and subsequently have fewer episodes of diarrhea. There is little convincing
evidence that Lactobacillus or Saccharomyces boulardii preparations
are useful for the prevention of travellers’ diarrhea(50,51). VACCINES Although there are currently no effective vaccines available
for the prevention of travellers’ diarrhea, immunoprevention for the most
frequent cause, namely ETEC, could significantly reduce the incidence of disease.
A killed, whole-cell vaccine against ETEC appears to be safe and efficacious(52,53),
but is not yet available. As well, a vaccine against Campylobacter jejuni
is under development and may prove useful for travellers to Southeast Asia(54).
Typhoid vaccine has a probable protective efficacy of 50% to 75% and is recommended
for travellers who will have significant exposure to contaminated food and
water, in smaller cities and villages or rural areas off the usual tourist
routes. Two typhoid vaccines are currently available; a parenteral, inactivated
Vi capsular polysaccharide vaccine and an oral (liquid or enteric-coated capsules)
attenuated live vaccine Ty21a(55). Travellers who may be at increased
risk for acquiring cholera such as health care professionals working in endemic
areas, aid workers in refugee camps, and perhaps those travelling in remote
areas where health care is not readily available may benefit from the live
attenuated oral cholera vaccine. However, the risk of cholera for the vast
majority of travellers is so low that cholera vaccination is not generally
recommended(56). THERAPY Although life-threatening dehydration is rarely seen in adults
with travellers’ diarrhea, fluid replacement is still of primary importance
in managing all cases. Diarrhea-induced dehydration is more of a concern in
children and elderly individuals but can usually be managed with oral rehydration
solutions(57), either those widely available in developing countries
or homemade (Table 2). Children < 2 years of age are at
high risk of acquiring travellers’ diarrhea and of suffering subsequent dehydration(58).
Instructions for commercially available oral rehydration salts, prepared using
boiled or treated water, should be carefully followed. Oral rehydration solutions
should be consumed or discarded within 12 hours if held at room temperature
or 24 hours if kept refrigerated. The dehydrated child should continue to
breast-feed on demand or, if bottle-fed, should be given full-strength lactose-free
or lactose-reduced formulas. Recommended foods for older children with dehydration
include starches (e.g., rice, noodles, potatoes), cereals, yogurt, fruits,
and vegetables. Immediate medical attention is required for the infant with
diarrhea who develops signs of moderate to severe dehydration such as sunken
eyes, absence of tears, reduced amount of or concentrated urine, or > 5% loss
in body weight. As well, infants with bloody diarrhea, fever > 38.9° C, or
persistent vomiting should receive immediate medical attention.
For most adults with otherwise uncomplicated travellers’ diarrhea,
hydration can be maintained with canned juices, carbonated soft drinks, purified
water, or clear salty soups. Beverages containing caffeine are discouraged
as they may increase gastrointestinal motility and fluid secretion. Dairy
products, prune juice, orange juice, and apple juice may also aggravate diarrhea.
Fluids should be consumed at a rate to allay thirst and maintain pale-coloured
urine. Adjunctive therapy may be aimed at reducing bowel motility or may be directed against bacterial toxins and/or against bacterial pathogens (Table 3). Antimotility agents are both safe and efficacious if judiciously used. Loperamide (Imodium®) is probably the most effective antimotility agent available to reduce the duration and severity of diarrhea in mild to moderate cases of travellers’ diarrhea (i.e., minimal cramps, no fever, and no blood in the stools) in adults and children > 2 years of age(59). However, caution should be exercised when using antimotility agents in children as there is an increased risk of severe complications including toxic megacolon in infants < 2 years of age(60) and hemolytic uremic syndrome in children infected with Escherichia coli O157:H7(61). Diphenoxylate (Lomotil®) is not recommended as it may be habit-forming and has been associated with toxic megacolon in patients with bacterial dysentery(62). Bismuth subsalicylate has antisecretory, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties, and may reduce the severity and duration of travellers’ diarrhea when used as treatment(63). The principle disadvantages of bismuth subsalicylate therapy include delayed onset of action, frequent dosing, and interference with the absorption of doxycycline, sometimes taken by travellers as an antimalarial agent. Self-administered antibiotic therapy with a fluoroquinolone
or extended-spectrum macrolide (e.g., azithromycin) may be indicated for those
with moderate to severe travellers’ diarrhea (Table 3). Therefore, with few exceptions, travellers should carry a
single dose or 3-day course of antibiotic as well as loperamide and a thermometer.
Loperamide may be used as an adjunct to antibiotics in the treatment of moderate
to severe travellers’ diarrhea. When given in combination with an antibiotic,
loperamide may reduce the duration of diarrhea without increasing toxicities
in patients with bacterial dysentery(64-66). Fluoroquinolones are currently the drugs of choice for the
empiric treatment of travellers’ diarrhea(67) (Table
3). Ciprofloxacin has been shown to reduce the duration of diarrhea, relieve
associated symptoms such as cramps, and reduce the number of liquid stools
passed(68). Although single-dose regimens of fluoroquinolones can
often provide equivalent relief compared to the standard 3-day regimens, significant
failure rates have been documented with Shigella dysenteriae and Campylobacter-induced
disease(65,69). In countries such as Thailand, where fluoroquinolone
resistance among Campylobacter species is almost universal, azithromycin
is a more effective alternative(32). In unique circumstances where
Cyclospora species are prevalent, such as Nepal during the summer months,
and symptoms are suggestive of this infection, a more rational choice for
empiric antimicrobial therapy for travellers’ diarrhea might be TMP-SMX (trimethoprim
and sulfamethoxazole)(29). For children < 16 years of age, in whom
fluoroquinolones are generally not recommended, azithromycin and cefixime(70,71)
are more appropriate agents of choice. However, in children with severe travellers’
diarrhea, the benefits of a quinolone antibiotic used for a 1 to 3-day course
far outweigh the risks(72). In pregnancy, appropriate choices would
include cefixime, and azithromycin. However, cefixime may not be ideal for
the treatment of shigellosis in adults(73) and experience with
the use of azithromycin in pregnancy is limited. Any febrile traveller with diarrhea who has visited a malaria
endemic area must have blood films performed immediately to rule out malaria.
Patients with severe travellers’ diarrhea not responding to empiric therapy
and those with severe underlying medical conditions, immunosuppression, or
grossly bloody stools should be referred to a specialist for further evaluation.
Travellers’ with persistent diarrhea lasting > 14 days, despite therapy, should
be managed according to the CATMAT statement of persistent diarrhea in the
returned traveller(74).
RECOMMENDATIONS Table 4 presents evidence-based medicine categories for the strength and quality of the evidence for the recommendations that follow (Table 5).
EXPIRATION This document will be updated every 3 years, or when new information becomes available. REFERENCES 1. Steffen R. Epidemiologic studies of travellers’ diarrhea,
severe gastro- 2. Ericsson CD, DuPont HL. Travelers’ diarrhea: approaches to prevention and treatment. Clin Infect Dis 1993;16:616-24. 3. Kollaritsch H. Traveller’s diarrhea among Austrian tourists in warm climate countries: I. epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 1989;5:74-81. 4. Holt P. Severe Salmonella infection in patients with reduced gastric acidity. Practitioner 1985;229:1027. 5. Neal KR, Scott HM, Slack RC et al. Omeprazole as a risk factor for Campylobacter gastroenteritis: case-control study. Br Med J 1996;312:414-15. 6. Daniels NA, Neimann J, Karpati A et al. Traveler’s diarrhea at sea: three outbreaks of waterborne enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli on cruise ships. J Infect Dis 2000;181:1491-95. 7. Brugha R, Vipond IB, Evans MR et al. A community outbreak of food-borne small round-structured virus gastroenteritis caused by a contaminated water supply. Epidemiol Infect 1999;122:145-54. 8. Evans MR, Tromans JP, Dexter EL et al. Consecutive Salmonella outbreaks traced to the same bakery. Epidemiol Infect 1996;116:161-67. 9. Jakubovic MO, Hochuli VK. Food poisoning among clients of a meals on wheels service. Commun Dis Rep 1996;6:R186-88. 10. Lew JF, Swerdlow DL, Dance ME et al. An outbreak of shigellosis aboard a cruise ship caused by a multiple-antibiotic-resistant strain of Shigella flexneri. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:413-20. 11. Snyder JD, Wells JG, Yashuk J et al. Outbreak of invasive Escherichia coli gastroenteritis on a cruise ship. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1984;33:281-84. 12. Mintz ED, Cartter ML, Hadler JL et al. Dose-response effects in an outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis. Epidemiol Infect 1994;112:13-23. 13. al-Ahmadi KS, el Bushra HE, al-Zahrani AS. An outbreak of food poisoning associated with restaurant-made mayonnaise in Abha, Saudi Arabia. J Diarrhoeal Dis Res 1998;16:201-04. 14. Pollack CV Jr, Fuller J. Update on emerging infections from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection associated with eating raw oysters and clams harvested from Long Island Sound - Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York, 1998. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:679-80. 15. Koo D, Aragon A, Moscoso V et al. Epidemic cholera in Guatemala, 1993: transmission of a newly introduced epidemic strain by street vendors. Epidemiol Infect 1996;116:121-26. 16. Harris JR. Are bottled beverages safe for travelers. Am J Public Health 1982;72:787-88. 17. Sheth NK, Wisniewski TR, Franson TR. Survival of enteric pathogens in common beverages: an in vitro study. Am J Gastroenterol 1988;83:658-60. 18. Dickens DL, DuPont HK, Johnson PC. Survival of bacterial enteropathogens in the ice of popular drinks. JAMA 1985;253:3141-43. 19. Moran J, Addy M, Newcombe R. The antibacterial effect of toothpastes on the salivary flora. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:193-99. 20. Mattila L. Clinical features and duration of traveler’s diarrhea in relation to its etiology. Clin Infect Dis 1994;19:728-34. 21. Mahon BE, Mintz ED, Greene KD et al. Reported cholera in the United States, 1992-1994: a reflection of global changes in cholera epidemiology. JAMA 1996;276:307-12. 22. Golledge CL, Riley TV. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea after doxycycline malaria prophylaxis. Lancet 1995;345:1377-78. 23. Reinthaler FF, Feierl G, Stunzner D et al. Diarrhea in returning Austrian tourists: epidemiology, etiology, and cost-analyses. J Travel Med 1998;5:65-72. 24. Jelinek T, Lotze M, Eichenlaub S et al. Prevalence of infection with Cryptosporidium parvum and Cyclospora cayetanensis among international travellers. Gut 1997;41:801-04. 25. López-Vélez R, Turrientes MC, Garrón C et al. Microsporidiosis in travelers with diarrhea from the tropics. J Travel Med 1999;6:223-27. 26. Mattila L, Siitonen A, Kyronseppa H et al. Seasonal variation in etiology of travelers’ diarrhea. J Infect Dis 1992;165:385-88. 27. Taylor DN, Echeverria P, Pitarangsi C et al. Influence of strain characteristics and immunity on the epidemiology of Campylobacter infections in Thailand. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:863-68. 28. Sanchez JL, Taylor DN. Cholera. Lancet 1997;349:1825-30. 29. Shlim DR, Hoge CW, Rajah R et al. Persistent high risk of diarrhea among foreigners in Nepal during the first 2 years of residence. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:613-16. 30. Hoge CW, Gambel JM, Srijan A et al. Trends in antibiotic resistance among diarrheal pathogens isolated in Thailand over 15 years. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:341-45. 31. DuPont HL. Antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter species - a new threat to travelers to Thailand. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:542-43. 32. Kuschner RA, Trofa AF, Thomas RJ et al. Use of azithromycin for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis in travelers to Thailand, an area where ciprofloxacin resistance is prevalent. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:536-41. 33. Gallardo F, Gascon J, Ruiz J et al. Campylobacter jejuni as a cause of traveler’s diarrhea: clinical features and antimicrobial susceptibility. J Travel Med 1998;5:23-26. 34. Mattila L, Siitonen A, Kyronseppa H et al. Risk behavior for travelers’ diarrhea among Finnish travelers. J Travel Med 1995;2:77-84. 35. Poli MA, Lewis RJ, Dickey RW et al. Identification of Caribbean ciguatoxins as the cause of an outbreak of fish poisoning among U.S. soldiers in Haiti. Toxicon 1997;35:733-41. 36. Lewis RJ. Socioeconomic impacts and management ciguatera in the Pacific. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 1992;85(5 Pt 2):427-34. 37. Bandres JC, Mathewson JJ, DuPont HL. Heat susceptibility of bacterial pathogens. Implications for the prevention of travelers’ diarrhea. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2261-63. 38. Backer HD. Effect of heat on the sterilization of artificially contaminated water. J Travel Med 1996;3:1-4. 39. Korich DG, Mead JR, Madore MS et al. Effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, chlorine, and monochloramine on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability. Appl Environ Microbiol 1990;56:1423-28. 40. Moorehead WP, Guasparini R, Donovan CA et al. Giardiasis outbreak from a chlorinated community water supply. Can J Public Health 1990;81:358-62. 41. Wright MS, Collins PA. Waterborne transmission of Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora and Giardia. Clin Lab Sci 1997;10:287-90. 42. DuPont HL, Ericsson CD, Johnson PC et al. Use of bismuth
subsalicylate for the prevention of travelers’ diarrhea. Rev Infect Dis
1990;12 43. DuPont HL. Chemoprophylaxis remains an option in travelers’ diarrhea. Gastroenterol 1991;86:402-03. 44. Reves RR, Johnson PC, Ericsson CD et al. Cost-effectiveness comparison of the use of antimicrobial agents for treatment or prophylaxis of travelers’ diarrhea. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2421-27. 45. Thomson MA, Booth IW. Treatment of traveller’s diarrhea. Economic aspects. Pharmacoeconomics 1996;9:382-91. 46. Ericsson CD, DuPont HL, Johnson PC et al. Prevention of travelers’ diarrhea by the tablet formulation of bismuth subsalicylate. JAMA 1987;257:1347-50. 47. DuPont HL, Galindo E, Evans DG et al. Prevention of travelers’ diarrhea with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim alone. Gastroenterology 1983;84:75-80. 48. Rademaker CM, Hoepelman IM, Wolfhagen MJ et al. Results of a double-blind placebo-controlled study using ciprofloxacin for prevention of travelers’ diarrhea. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1989;8:690-94. 49. Scott DA, Haberberger RL, Thornton SA et al. Norfloxacin for the prophylaxis of travelers’ diarrhea in U.S. military personnel. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1990;42:160-64. 50. Hilton E, Kolakowski P, Singer C et al. Efficacy of Lactobacillus GC as a diarrheal preventive in travelers. J Travel Med 1997;4:41-3. 51. Kollaritsch H, Holst H, Grobara P et al. Prevention of traveler’s diarrhea with Saccharomyces boulardii. Results of a placebo controlled double-blind study [Article in German]. Fortschr Med 1993;111:152-56. 52. Savarino SJ, Brown FM, Hall E et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an oral, killed enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-cholera toxin B subunit vaccine in Egyptian adults. J Infect Dis 1998;177:796-99. 53. Weidermann G, Kollaritsch H, Kundi M et al. Double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled pilot study evaluating efficacy and reactogenicity of an oral ETEC B-subunit-inactivated whole cell vaccine against travelers’ diarrhea (Preliminary report). J Travel Med 2000;7:27-9. 54. Scott DA. Vaccines against Campylobacter jejuni. J Infect Dis 1997;176 (Suppl 2):S183-88. 55. National Advisory Committee on Immunization. Typhoid vaccine. In: Canadian immunization guide. 5th edition. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada 1998 (Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Cat. no. H49-8/1998E). 56. Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel. Statement on oral cholera vaccination. CCDR 1998;24(ACS-5):1-4. 57. CDC. The management of acute diarrhea in children: oral rehydration, maintenance, and nutritional therapy. MMWR 1992;41(No. RR-16):1-20. 58. Pitzinger B, Steffen R, Tschopp A. Incidence and clinical features of traveler’s diarrhea in infants and children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:719-73. 59. Van Loon FPL, Bennish ML, Speelman P et al. Double-blind trial of loperamide for treating acute watery diarrhoea in expatriates in Bangladesh. Gut 1989;30:492-95. 60. Bhutta TI, Tahir KI. Loperamide poisoning in children. Lancet 1990;335:63. 61. Tarr PI, Christie DL. Antimotility agents and E. coli infection. CMAJ 1999;160:984, 86. 62. DuPont HL, Hornick RB. Adverse effect of lomotil therapy in shigellosis. JAMA 1973;226:1525-28. 63. Ericsson CD, Tannenbaum C, Charles TT. Antisecretory and anti-inflammatory properties of bismuth subsalicylate. Rev Infect Dis 1990;12 (Suppl 1):S16-20. 64. Ericsson CD, DuPont HL, Mathewson JJ et al. Treatment of travelers’ diarrhea with sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim and loperamide. JAMA 1990;263:257-61. 65. Petruccelli BP, Murphy GS, Sanchez JL et al. Treatment of travelers’ diarrhea with ciprofloxacin and loperamide. J Infect Dis 1992;165:557-60. 66. Ericsson CD, DuPont HL, Mathewson JJ. Single dose ofloxacin plus loperamide compared with single dose or three days of ofloxacin in the treatment of traveler’s diarrhea. J Travel Med 1997;4:3-7. 67. DuPont HL, Ericsson CD, Mathewson JJ et al. Five versus three days of ofloxacin therapy for travelers’ diarrhea: A placebo controlled study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992;36:87-91. 68. Salam I, Katelaris P, Leigh-Smith S et al. Randomised trial of single-dose ciprofloxacin for travellers’ diarrhoea. Lancet 1994;344:1537-39. 69. Bennish ML, Salam MA, Khan WA et al. Treatment of shigellosis: III. comparison of one- or two-dose ciprofloxacin with standard 5-day therapy. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:727-34. 70. Helvaci M, Bektaslar D, Ozkaya B et al. Comparative efficacy of cefixime and ampicillin-sulbactam in shigellosis in children. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1998;40:131-34. 71. Ashkenazi S, Amir J, Waisman Y et al. A randomized, double-blind study comparing cefixime and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of childhood shigellosis. J Pediatr 1993;123:817-21. 72. Schaad UB, Christoforos S, Wedgwood J et al. Clinical, radiologic and magnetic resonance monitoring for skeletal toxicity in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis receiving a three-month course of ciprofloxacin. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:723-29. 73. Salam MA, Seas C, Khan WA et al. Treatment of shigellosis: IV. Cefixime is ineffective in shigellosis in adults. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:505-08. 74. Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel. Persistent diarrhea in the returned traveller. CCDR 1998;24(ACS-1):1-4. * Members: Dr. B. Ward (Chairman); H. Birk; M. Bodie-Collins (Executive Secretary); Dr. S.E. Boraston; Dr. H.O. Davies; Dr. K. Gamble; Dr. L. Green; Dr. J.S. Keystone; Dr. P.J. Plourde; Dr. J.R. Salzman; Dr. D. Tessier. Liaison Representatives: Dr. R. Birnbaum (CSIH); L. Cobb (CUSO); Dr. V. Marchessault (CPS and NACI); Dr. H. Onyette (CIDS); Dr. R. Saginur (CPHA); Dr. F. Stratton (ACE). Ex-Officio Members: Dr. E. Callary (HC); Dr. M. Cetron
(CDC); R. Dewart (CDC); Member Emeritus: Dr. C.W.L. Jeanes. * This statement was prepared by Dr. P. Plourde and approved by CATMAT. [Canada Communicable Disease Report]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated: 2001-03-15 | |||