Legionella pneumophila : Infectious substances pathogen safety data sheets

Section I – Infectious agent

Name

Legionella pneumophila

Agent type

Bacteria

Taxonomy

Family

Legionellaceae

Genus

Legionella

Species

pneumophila

Synonym or cross-reference

Legionellosis, Legionnaires' disease, Legionnaires' pneumonia, legion fever, Pontiac fever, nonpneumonic legionellosisFootnote 1.

Characteristics

Brief description

Legionella pneumophila is a gram negative, intracellular, aerobic bacteria in the family Legionellaceae. There are 3 subspecies: L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri, L. pneumophila subsp. pascullei, and L. pneumophila subsp. PneumophilaFootnote 2. L. pneumophila is further divided into serogroups based on antigenic characterization; 16 serogroups are currently recognizedFootnote 3Footnote 4. L.pneumophila stains poorly and can appear in different forms. In clinical lung and sputum specimens, L. pneumophila is a short rod 3-5 µm in length, whereas when cultured, L. pneumophila may produce filamentous forms of 10-25 µm in length. Motility is limited in L. pneumophila, and some strains are completely non-motileFootnote 4.

Properties

L. pneumophila is an intracellular bacteria. In aquatic environments, L. pneumophila infects and multiplies in free-living amoebae, ciliated protozoa and slime mouldsFootnote 5Footnote 6. Within mammalian hosts, L. pneumophila infects and multiplies in macrophages and monocytesFootnote 4Footnote 7 . The infection process involves the injection of pathogenicity effectors into host cells via a type IV secretion systemFootnote 3. L. pneumophila is also able to survive extracellularly in aquatic systems within biofilms. Within these settings, L. pneumophila is protected from environmental stressors such as biocides and heatFootnote 3Footnote 5Footnote 8. L. pneumophila can multiply at temperatures ranging from 20-42°CFootnote 3.

Section II – Hazard identification

Pathogenicity and toxicity

There are two distinct forms of L. pneumophila-associated disease in humans: a non-pneumonic form, commonly referred to as Pontiac fever, and a pneumonic form, which is known as Legionnaires' disease (LD)Footnote 1Footnote 3Footnote 8. Collectively, these 2 diseases are known as legionellosis. LD accounts for the majority of reported cases of legionellosisFootnote 9.

Pontiac fever manifests as an acute, self-limiting influenza-like illness that lasts for 2 to 5 daysFootnote 4. The primary symptoms of disease include fever, chills, headache, malaise, muscle pain, cough, nausea, and sore throatFootnote 10. Other symptoms such as dyspnea, thoracic pain, vomiting and diarrhea have also been described. No deaths have been associated with Pontiac fever. The cause of Pontiac fever is not well understood; it may be caused by the inhalation of bacterial toxins, such as endotoxin, or an acute allergic reaction to L. pneumophilaFootnote 1Footnote 3.

Legionnaires' disease presents initially with symptoms of fever, loss of appetite, headache, malaise, and lethargyFootnote 3. Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea may also be presentFootnote 1Footnote 3Footnote 11. A cough then develops, and as many as 50% of patients may have sputum production. Headache, obtundation, seizures, and focal neurological findings may also be present. In some patients, primarily immunocompromised patients, extra-pulmonary infections can occur, such as splenomegaly, pericarditis, myocarditis, wound infections, endocarditis, arthritis, and central nervous system (CNS) infectionsFootnote 11. Symptoms from CNS infection may include confusion, delirium, depression, disorientation, hallucinations, tremors, hyperactive or reduced reflexes, and cerebral dysfunctionFootnote 4. Severe cases of LD can lead to respiratory failure, shock, brain sequelae, acute kidney failure, multi-organ failure, and ultimately death. The overall LD death rate is in the range of 5-15%Footnote 1Footnote 3Footnote 4Footnote 8. In untreated immunosuppressed patients, the death rate can be as high as 40-80%, but can be reduced to 5-30% with appropriate treatmentFootnote 8.

In rare instances, L. pneumophila has been reported as the cause of wound infections following the immersion of a wound in contaminated waterFootnote 12Footnote 13.

Although serological surveys among wild and domestic animals have confirmed widespread exposure to and infection with L. pneumophila, there is a lack of clinical reports of L. pneumophila associated disease in animalsFootnote 7. L. pneumophila infection in animals does not generally result in the development of disease; however, LD has been reported in a calf.

Epidemiology

Cases of legionellosis are reported globallyFootnote 3. The annual global disease incidence of LD is reported to be between 4-20 cases per million populationFootnote 3, representing 2-9% of all cases of community-acquired pneumoniaFootnote 11. The number of cases of LD is likely underreported due to difficulty in distinguishing LD from other forms of pneumonia, lack of awareness among clinicians, and limited availability and shortcomings of available diagnostic testsFootnote 14. In recent years, the incidence of LD has been increasing in the United States and in EuropeFootnote 15. Canadian data also demonstrates a similar increasing trend in the number of reported cases of legionellosisFootnote 16. In Canada, there are generally less than 100 cases of LD reported annuallyFootnote 17.

Along with L. pneumophila, L. micdadei, L. bozemanae, L. longbeachae, and L. dumoffii can also cause legionellosis in humans; however, L. pneumophila is by far the most clinically relevant species, causing greater than 90% of cases. L. pneumophila serogroup 1 is the most virulent and prevalent disease causing serogroupFootnote 11. Co-infection with multiple serogroups has been recognized. Cases of legionellosis are commonly reported in the summer and fall; however, cases can occur throughout the yearFootnote 6. Sporadic cases and outbreaks of legionellosis have been reportedFootnote 18. Outbreaks of Pontiac fever can have an explosive presentation with attack rates as high as 95%, while outbreaks of LD can be much more difficult to detect due to lower attack rates of 0.1-5%Footnote 1Footnote 4Footnote 19.

Of the reported cases of LD, 75-80% occur in individuals over 50 years of age, and 60-70% of those infected are maleFootnote 8. The likelihood of development of disease following exposure is related, in part, to host risk factors such as being immunocompromised (for example, organ transplant recipients, cancer patients, corticosteroid treatment), smoking, heavy drinking, pulmonary disease, and chronic respiratory, cardiac or renal illness. In nosocomial cases, risk factors for development of disease include recent surgery, intubation, mechanical ventilation, aspiration, nasogastric tubes, and the use of respiratory therapy equipment.

LD is very rare in cattle, and predisposing factors such as poor hygiene, poor diet, and bad animal management practices likely contribute to the development of diseaseFootnote 7.

Host range

Natural host(s)

Amoebae, ciliated protozoa, slime moulds, and humans are the primary natural hosts for L. pneumophilaFootnote 5.

Other host(s)

Natural infection of calves with L. pneumophila has been reported, although disease is rareFootnote 7Footnote 20. L. pneumophila antibodies have been detected in various wild and domestic animals including horsesFootnote 20Footnote 21Footnote 22, cattleFootnote 20Footnote 21Footnote 23, pigsFootnote 21, sheepFootnote 20Footnote 21Footnote 23, dogsFootnote 21, goatsFootnote 21Footnote 23, camelsFootnote 20Footnote 23, antelopesFootnote 20, buffaloesFootnote 20, and poultryFootnote 24. Guinea pigs, horses, rhesus macaques, mice, and rats are susceptible to experimental infectionFootnote 25Footnote 26Footnote 27Footnote 28.

Infectious dose

UnknownFootnote 8.

Incubation period

Pontiac fever usually develops within 48 hours of exposureFootnote 4. The incubation period of LD ranges from 2-14 days, with a median onset of symptoms of 4 daysFootnote 3.

Communicability

L. pneumophila is most commonly transmitted to humans and animals through the inhalation of aerosolized water containing the bacteria, and aspiration of contaminated waterFootnote 1Footnote 3. Less commonly, direct contact of infectious material with broken skin can result in infection in humansFootnote 11Footnote 12Footnote 13. Most cases of legionellosis occur following environmental exposure. Although previously unrecognized, a probable case of human-to-human transmission of LD was reported following close and sustained contact in a poorly ventilated spaceFootnote 14Footnote 29. There are no reports of animal-to-animal transmission, or zoonotic transmission.

Section III – Dissemination

Reservoir

L. pneumophila is ubiquitous worldwide in natural and artificial aquatic environmentsFootnote 8Footnote 11. It is found in most fresh water sources including lakes, ponds, rivers and creeks; however, these natural aquatic environments are rarely identified as sources of human infectionFootnote 6. Common exposure sources of L. pneumophila are artificial aquatic environments such as the water found in plumbing systems, water heaters, spas, and cooling towersFootnote 3Footnote 6Footnote 11. Rainwater and soil may also be sources of L. pneumophilaFootnote 30.

Zoonosis

None.

Vectors

None.

Section IV – Stability and viability

Drug susceptibility/resistance

L. pneumophila is sensitive to most macrolides, tetracyclines, ketolides and quinolonesFootnote 3Footnote 11. LD is commonly treated with azithromycin, doxycycline, levofloxacin and fluoroquinoloneFootnote 3Footnote 4Footnote 11.

L. pneumophila is resistant to β-lactams and aminoglycosidesFootnote 3Footnote 11. Fluoroquinolone-resistant L. pneumophila strains have been identified among patients treated with these antibiotics, leading to treatment failure and poor prognosisFootnote 15Footnote 31.

Susceptibility to disinfectants

Ethanol (70%), sodium hypochlorite (1%), phenol (2%), glutaraldehyde (2%), and hydrogen peroxide (6%) are effective against L. pneumophilaFootnote 32.

Physical inactivation

L. pneumophila can be inactivated by autoclaving at 121°C for 15 minutesFootnote 33. In water systems, L. pneumophila inactivation can be achieved by UV light exposure at 254 nm for 320 minutes at 30 mW-s/cm2, heat exposure at 80°C for 0.4 minutes, ozonation, and copper-silver ionizationFootnote 34.

Survival outside host

L. pneumophila is able to grow at temperatures between 20°C and 42°C, with optimal growth observed at 35-37°CFootnote 3. There is little to no growth of L. pneumophila at temperatures below 20°CFootnote 4. It can be isolated from aquatic environments up to 70°C, but is rapidly destroyed at temperatures above 70°CFootnote 4Footnote 11. It was found to survive up to 139 days in distilled water, and for 415 days in tap waterFootnote 35Footnote 36. L. pneumophila has the ability to persist outside of a host in biofilmsFootnote 4.

Section V – First aid/medical

Surveillance

Diagnostic methods for L. pneumophila include culture, antigen detection in urine (for serogroup 1 only), paired serology tests, detection of bacteria by immunofluorescent staining, and molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testingFootnote 11Footnote 14.

Note: The specific recommendations for surveillance in the laboratory should come from the medical surveillance program, which is based on a local risk assessment of the pathogens and activities being undertaken, as well as an overarching risk assessment of the biosafety program as a whole. More information on medical surveillance is available in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook (CBH).

First aid/treatment

Azithromycin, doxycycline, and levofloxacin are considered first-line antibiotics for the treatment of LDFootnote 3Footnote 11. For severe LD, the use of fluoroquinolone is recommendedFootnote 8. Treatment typically lasts for 10-14 days in immunocompetent patients, and 21 days in immunocompromised patientsFootnote 4. LD can be resolved in 95-99% of cases in otherwise healthy patients with timely and appropriate antibiotic treatmentFootnote 3. Less than half of patients may respond favourably if there is a delay in the initiation of treatment, in immunosuppressed patients, and in cases of respiratory failure. Pontiac fever does not usually require treatment.

Note: More information on the medical surveillance program can be found in the CBH, and by consulting the Canadian Immunization Guide.

Immunization

NoneFootnote 8.

Note: More information on the medical surveillance program can be found in the CBHFootnote 37, and by consulting the Canadian Immunization Guide.

Prophylaxis

No known post-exposure prophylaxis.

Note: More information on prophylaxis as part of the medical surveillance program can be found in the CBH.

Section VI – Laboratory hazard

Laboratory-acquired infections

One presumed case of laboratory acquired infection with L. pneumophila has been reported in association with aerosol or droplet exposure during animal challenge studiesFootnote 37.

Note: Please consult the Canadian Biosafety Standard (CBS) and CBH for additional details on requirements for reporting exposure incidents. A Canadian biosafety guideline describing notification and reporting procedures is also available.

Sources/specimens

Sputum and lower respiratory tract specimens are the most common clinical sources of L. pneumophilaFootnote 3. Other less common sources include pleural fluid, blood, pericardial fluid, tissue samples, infected wounds, peritoneal fluid, heart valves, joint fluids, bone marrow and intestine. Soil, and water samples from natural and artificial water environments may also be a source of L. pneumophilaFootnote 6Footnote 30.

Primary hazards

Inhalation of aerosolized infectious material is the primary hazard associated with exposure to L. pneumophilaFootnote 1Footnote 3. Exposure of broken skin to infectious material is another hazard associated with exposure to L. pneumophila.

Special hazards

None.

Section VII – Exposure controls/personal protection

Risk group classification

L. pneumophila is a Risk Group 2 Human Pathogen and Risk Group 1 Animal PathogenFootnote 38Footnote 39.

Containment requirements

Containment Level 2 facilities, equipment, and operational practices outlined in the CBS for work involving infectious or potentially infectious materials, animals, or cultures.

Protective clothing

The applicable Containment Level 2 requirements for personal protective equipment and clothing outlined in the CBS to be followed. The personal protective equipment could include the use of a labcoat and dedicated footwear (e.g., boots, shoes) or additional protective footwear (e.g., boot or shoe covers) where floors may be contaminated (e.g., animal cubicles, PM rooms), gloves when direct skin contact with infected materials or animals is unavoidable, and eye protection where there is a known or potential risk of exposure to splashes.

Note: A local risk assessment will identify the appropriate hand, foot, head, body, eye/face, and respiratory protection, and the personal protective equipment requirements for the containment zone and work activities must be documented.

Other precautions

A biological safety cabinet (BSC) or other primary containment devices to be used for activities with open vessels, based on the risks associated with the inherent characteristics of the regulated material, the potential to produce infectious aerosols or aerosolized toxins, the handling of high concentrations of regulated materials, or the handling of large volumes of regulated materials.

Use of needles and syringes to be strictly limited. Bending, shearing, re-capping, or removing needles from syringes to be avoided, and if necessary, performed only as specified in standard operating procedures (SOPs). Additional precautions are required with work involving animals or large-scale activities.

For diagnostic laboratories handling primary specimens that may contain Legionella pneumophila, the following resources may be consulted:

Section VIII – Handling and storage

Spills

Allow aerosols to settle. Wearing personal protective equipment, gently cover the spill with absorbent paper towel and apply suitable disinfectant, starting at the perimeter and working towards the centre. Allow sufficient contact time before clean up (CBH).

Disposal

All materials/substances that have come in contact with the regulated materials should be completely decontaminated before they are removed from the containment zone or standard operating procedures (SOPs) to be in place to safely and securely move or transport waste out of the containment zone to a designated decontamination area / third party. This can be achieved by using decontamination technologies and processes that have been demonstrated to be effective against the regulated material, such as chemical disinfectants, autoclaving, irradiation, incineration, an effluent treatment system, or gaseous decontamination (CBH).

Storage

The applicable Containment Level 2 requirements for storage outlined in the CBS are to be followed. Primary containers of regulated materials removed from the containment zone to be labelled, leakproof, impact resistant, and kept either in locked storage equipment or within an area with limited access.

Section IX – Regulatory and other information

Canadian regulatory information

Controlled activities with Legionella pneumophila require a Human Pathogens and Toxins Licence issued by the Public Health Agency of Canada.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of applicable designations, regulations, or legislations:

Last file update

September, 2021

Prepared by

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada.

Disclaimer

The scientific information, opinions, and recommendations contained in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet have been developed based on or compiled from trusted sources available at the time of publication. Newly discovered hazards are frequent and this information may not be completely up to date. The Government of Canada accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, sufficiency, or reliability or for any loss or injury resulting from the use of the information.

Persons in Canada are responsible for complying with the relevant laws, including regulations, guidelines and standards applicable to the import, transport, and use of pathogens in Canada set by relevant regulatory authorities, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment and Climate Change Canada, and Transport Canada. The risk classification and related regulatory requirements referenced in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet, such as those found in the Canadian Biosafety Standard, may be incomplete and are specific to the Canadian context. Other jurisdictions will have their own requirements.

Copyright © Public Health Agency of Canada, 2021, Canada

References:

Footnote 1

Heymann, D. L. 2008. Legionellosis. Control of Communicable Diseases Manual (19th ed. pp. 337). American Public Health Association.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Catalogue of Life. 2021. Legionella pneumophila. Available at https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/3SXDJ

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Edelstein, P. H., and C. Luck. 2015 Legionella (Chapter 49) Manual of Clinical Microbiology (11th ed. pp. 887). Eds. Jorgensen, J. H.; Carroll, K. C.; Pfaller, M. A.; Landry, M. L.; Richter, S. S.; Warnock, D. W. ASM Press.

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

World Health Organization. 2007. Legionella and the Prevention of Legionellosis. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43233

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

Fields, B. S., R. F. Benson, and R. E. Besser. 2002. Legionella and Legionnaires' Disease: 25 Years of Investigation. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 15(3): 506-526.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

Carratala, J., and C. Garcia-Vidal. 2010. An update on Legionella. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 23: 152-157.

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Fabbi, M., M. C. Pastoris, E. Scanziani, S. Magnino, and L. Di Matteo. 1998. Epidemiological and Environmental Investigations of Legionella pneumophila Infection in Cattle and Case Report of Fatal Pneumonia in a Calf. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 36(7): 1942-1947.

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

World Health Organization. 2018. Legionellosis – Fact sheet. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/legionellosis

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021. Legionella (Legionnaires' Disease and Pontiac Fever).

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Tossa, P., M. Deloge-Abarkan, D. Zmirou-Navier, P. Hartemann, and L. Mathieu. 2006. Pontiac fever: an operational definition for epidemiological studies. BMC Public Health, 6: 112.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

Cunha, B. A., A. Burillo, and E. Bouza. 2016. Legionnaires' disease. The Lancet, 387: 376-385.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

Brabender, W., D. R. Hinthorn, M. Asher, N. J. Lindsey, and C. Liu. 1983. Legionella pneumophila Wound Infection. JAMA, 250(22): 3091-3092.

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Lowry, P. W., R. J. Blandenship, W. Gridley, N. J. Troup, and L. S. Tompkins. 1991. A cluster of legionella sternal-wound infections due to postoperative topical exposure to contaminated tap water. New England Journal of Medicine, 324:109–113.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Footnote 14

Graham, F. F., S. Hales, P. S. White, and M. G. Baker. 2020. Review Global seroprevalence of legionellosis – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports Nature Research, 10: 7337.

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Footnote 15

Herwaldt, L. A., and A. R. Marra. 2018. Legionella: a reemerging pathogen. Current Opinion Infectious Diseases, 31: 325-333.

Return to footnote 15 referrer

Footnote 16

Public Health Agency of Canada, 2021. Notifiable Diseases Online – Legionellosis.

Return to footnote 16 referrer

Footnote 17

Public Health Agency of Canada. 2019. Legionella. Available at https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/infectious-diseases/legionella.html

Return to footnote 17 referrer

Footnote 18

Borges, V., A. Nunes, D. A. Sampaio, L. Vieira, J. Machado, M. J. Simoes, P. Goncalves, and J. P. Gomes. 2016. Legionella pneumophila strain associated with the first evidence of person-to-person transmission of Legionnaires'disease: a unique mosaic genetic backbone. Scientific Reports, 6: 26261.

Return to footnote 18 referrer

Footnote 19

Glick, T. J., M. B. Gregg, B. Berman, G. Mallison, W. W. Rhodes, and I. Kassanoff. 1978. Pontiac Fever – An Epidemic of Unknown Etiology in a Health Department: I. Clinical and Epidemiologic Aspects. American Journal of Epidemiology, 107(2): 149-160.

Return to footnote 19 referrer

Footnote 20

Boldur, I., A. Cohen, R. Tamarin-Landau, and D. Sompolinsky. 1987. Isolation of Legionella pneumophila From Calves and the Prevalence of Antibodies in Cattle, Sheep, Horses, Antelopes, Buffaloes and Rabbits. Veterinary Microbiology, 13: 313-320.

Return to footnote 20 referrer

Footnote 21

Collins, M. T., S. N. Cho, and J. S. Reif. 1982. Prevalence of Antibodies to Legionella pneumophila in Animal Population. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 15(1): 130-136.

Return to footnote 21 referrer

Footnote 22

Cho, S. N., M. T. Collins, and J. S. Reif. 1984. Serologic evidence of Legionella infection in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 45: 2600–2602.

Return to footnote 22 referrer

Footnote 23

Phakkey, A., K. J. Linkqvist, T. Omland, and J. P. Berdal. 1990. Legionella antibodies in human and animal populations in Kenya. APMIS, 98: 43-49.

Return to footnote 23 referrer

Footnote 24

Pan, X., and X. A. Yang. 1999. Serological investigation of Legionella infection in six-species of poultries and domestic animals in Luzhou City, Sichuan Province. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing. Xue Za Zhi. 20: 108–110. [abstract only]

Return to footnote 24 referrer

Footnote 25

Fitzgeorge, R. B., A. B. M. Broster, P. Hambleton, and P. J. Dennis. 1983. Aerosol infection of animals with strains of Legionella pneumophila of different virulence: comparison with intraperitoneal and intranasal routes of infection. J. Hyg. Camb., 90: 81-89.

Return to footnote 25 referrer

Footnote 26

Dubuisson, J. F., and M. S. Swanson. (2006) Mouse infection by Legionella, a model to analyze autophagy. Autophagy, 2(3): 179-182.

Return to footnote 26 referrer

Footnote 27

Cho, S. N., M. T. Collins, J. S. Reif, and A. E. McChesney. 1983. Experimental infections of horses with Legionella pneumophila. Am J Vet Res, 44(4): 662-668.

Return to footnote 27 referrer

Footnote 28

Rolstad, B., and B.P. Berdal. 1981. Immune Defenses Against Legionella pneumophila in Rats. Infection and Immunity, 32(2): 805-812.

Return to footnote 28 referrer

Footnote 29

Correia, A. M., J. Goncalves, and J. P. Gomes. 2016. Probable Person-to-Person Transmission of Legionnaires' Disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(5): 497-498.

Return to footnote 29 referrer

Footnote 30

Van Heijnsbergen, E., A. M. de Roda Husman, W. J. Lodder, M. Bouwknegt, A. E. Docters van Leeuwen, J. P. Bruin, S. M. Euser, J. W. den Boer, and J. A. C. Schalk. 2014. Viable Legionella pneumophila bacteria in natural soil and rainwater puddles. J. Appl. Microbiol., 117(3): 882-890.

Return to footnote 30 referrer

Footnote 31

Shadoud, L.; I. Almahmoud, S. Jarraud, J. Etienne, S. Larrat, C. Schwebel, J. F. Timsit, D. Schneider, and M. Maurin. 2015. Hidden Selection of Bacterial Resistance to Fluoroquinolones In Vivo: The Case of Legionella pneumophila and Humans. EBioMedicine, 2: 1179-1185.

Return to footnote 31 referrer

Footnote 32

Wendt, C.; R. Frei, and A. F. Widmer. 2015. Decontamination, Disinfection, and Sterilization (Chapter 13) Manual of Clinical Microbiology (11th ed. pp. 183). Eds. Jorgensen, J. H.; Carroll, K. C.; Pfaller, M. A.; Landry, M. L.; Richter, S. S.; Warnock, D. W. ASM Press.

Return to footnote 32 referrer

Footnote 33

Joslyn, L. J. 2001. Sterilization by Heat. S.S. Block (Ed.), Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation (5th ed. pp. 695). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Return to footnote 33 referrer

Footnote 34

Lin, Y. E., J. E. Stout, and V. L. Yu. 2001. Control of Legionella. S.S. Block (Ed.), Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation (5th ed., pp. 505). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Return to footnote 34 referrer

Footnote 35

Schwake, D. O., A. Alum, and M. Abbaszadegan. 2015. Impact of Environmental Factors on Legionella Populations in Drinking Water. Pathogens, 4: 269-282.

Return to footnote 35 referrer

Footnote 36

Skaliy, P., and H. V. McEachern. 1979. Survival of the Legionnaires' disease bacterium in water. Ann. Intern. Med. 90:662-663.

Return to footnote 36 referrer

Footnote 37

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Legionella pneumophila and other Legionella spp. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories 6th ed. pp. 168.

Return to footnote 37 referrer

Footnote 38

Public Health Agency of Canada. 2018. Human Pathogens and Toxins Act (HPTA) (S.C. 2009, c.24).

Return to footnote 38 referrer

Footnote 39

Government of Canada. Sept 2021. ePATHogen - Risk Group Database. Sept 2021:

Return to footnote 39 referrer

Page details

Date modified: