Public Health Agency of Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada
Help the Government of Canada organize its website! Complete an anonymous 5-minute questionnaire. Start now.

Share this page

EPIDERMOPHYTON FLOCCOSUM, MICROSPORUM SPP., TRICHOPHYTON SPP.

PATHOGEN SAFETY DATA SHEET - INFECTIOUS SUBSTANCES

SECTION I - INFECTIOUS AGENT

NAME: Epidermophyton floccosum, Microsporum spp., Trichophyton spp.

SYNONYM OR CROSS REFERENCE: Dermatophytes (1), Dermatophytosis, Tinea, Ringworm, Jock itch, Athletes foot, Onycomycosis (2), Epidermophytosis (3), Trichophytosis (4), Microsporosis (5).

CHARACTERISTICS: These keratinophilic and keratinolytic ascomycetous molds are recognizable by their typical macrospora, which are also used to identify their genera (6). Macrspora are primarily distinguished by the thickness and roughness of their wall (7). Depending on the genera, they may have microconidia (Microsporum spp. and Trichophyton spp.) or they may not (E. flocossum). In the laboratory, they grow efficiently on Sabouraud dextrose agar, at 25˚C. Microsporum spp. and Trichophyton spp. have demonstrated the ability to produce a form that can accomplish meiosis (also known as a perfect form).

SECTION II - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

PATHOGENICITY/TOXICITY: Dermatophytosis can affect all keratinized areas of the body (hair, skin and nails) (2). Depending on the region that is affected, the symptoms may vary. If hair is infected (tinea capitis, tinea barbea), there may be hair loss (ectotrix) or breakage (endotrix). On the skin, lesions may look circular or annular and elevated, producing a ringworm infection form. Zoophilic dermatophyte infections are more inflammatory (vesicle, pustules and blisters) than those caused by antropophilic dermatophytes. Infection of human nails may present as discoloration, dystrophy, hyperkeratosis and occasionally onycholysis (2) . The disease is not fatal. The main effects are aesthetic and will persist until treated with the appropriate medication.

EPIDEMIOLOGY: This pathogen occurs worldwide and infections are relatively frequent (8). The main pathogen in northern Europe and North America is Trichophyton rubrum, and Microsporum canis. Zoophilic dermatophytes are more common in southern Europe and Arabic countries. Farm worker are more susceptible to infection with tinea barbea (9). In the case of tinea cruris, men are more susceptible than women. Tinea cruris is commonly associated with tinea pedis and occurs when ambient temperature and humidity are high.

HOST RANGE: The dermatophytes can infect all mammals and reptiles. Infection of birds is rare (1) . Some species are host-specific (10). Depending on the host and the site of the infection the form of the lesion may vary.

INFECTIOUS DOSE: Unknown

MODE OF TRANSMISSION: Direct or indirect contact with skin or scalp lesions of infected people, animals or fomites (i.e. floors, shower stalls, clothing, hairbrushes, etc. (8) ) contaminated with desquamated epithelium (9). In individuals with suppressed cell-mediated immunity, infection may occur via broken skin.

INCUBATION PERIOD: The incubation period is from several days to a few weeks, depending on the species and the host (9).

COMMUNICABILITY: They present a low to moderate communicability depending on species (11). For zoophilic species (i.e M. canis, M. equinum, M. gallinae, M. persicolor, T.equinum, T. mentagrophytes, T. sarkisovii, T. simmii and, T. verrucosum (1)), transmission occurs mostly between humans and animals, with limited human-to-human transmission (12). Antropophilic species are highly contagious between humans (13).

SECTION III - DISSEMINATION

RESERVOIR: Common reservoirs include cat, dog, macaque, rabbit, sheep, human and soil (14). The dermatophyte's reservoir is often indicated by their nomenclature: animal (zoophilic), human (antropophilic), and soil (geophilic).

ZOONOSIS: Reported human dermatophytosis is often acquired from animals, usually from mammals and reptiles (1). Zoonosis from birds is rare but has been documented.

VECTORS: None

SECTION IV - STABILITY AND VIABILITY

DRUG SUSCEPTIBILITY: Depending on the agent and the site of infection, the pharmaceutical susceptibility may vary (9). For tinea capitis, griseofulvin, or an oral azole drug (ketoconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole) are used, but treatment may require several months to be effective. For tinea corporis, tinea cruris, tinea pedis, tinea manuum and tinea faciei, there are a variety of effective topical treatments, including naftifine (1%), terbinafine (1%), butenafine (1%), chlotriminazole (1%), econazole (1%), ketoconazole (1%), miconazole (2%), oxyconazole (1%), sulconazole (1%), cyclopyrox (1%) and tolnaftate (1%). For nail infections, topical therapy normally fails and systemic oral therapy for many months is often required.

DRUG RESISTANCE: Resistance against ketoconazole has been shown by Microsporum gyseum, as well as against miconazole and clotrimazole in certain strains (15). Susceptibility of Trichophyton mentagrophytes has been decreasing against fluconazole, and possibly against ketoconazole and griseofulvin (16).

SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DISINFECTANTS: Dermatophytes are susceptible to phenolic compounds, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, iodophors and sodium hypochloride (1%) (17).

PHYSICAL INACTIVATION: The infectious substance can be inactivated by UV C (18), gamma (19) and microwave (aerosol) (20) radiation; moist heat (121°C for at least 20 min (21)); and dry heat (165-170°C for 2 hours).

SURVIVAL OUTSIDE HOST: This agent can survive on a variety of surfaces and mediums, including, but not limited, to sand, floors, shower stalls, clothing, and hairbrushes) (8). Water can also be a source of infection (contamination reported in public bath). Depending on the species, dermatophytes can survive up to twenty months on skin scales at room temperature (22). Most dermatophytes can survive in salt water (50% NaCl) for at least 52 weeks (23).

SECTION V - FIRST AID / MEDICAL

SURVEILLANCE: Monitor for symptoms (9) . Confirm infection using potassium hydroxide denaturation followed by microscopic examination of cultured scrapings from the head or by skin or nail biopsy.

Note: All diagnostic methods are not necessarily available in all countries.

FIRST AID/TREATMENT: Treat with appropriate fungicide as directed by a physician (9). The length of the treatment and the dosage will depend on the fungicide employed.

IMMUNIZATION: There are currently no vaccines available for humans. Commercial vaccines intended to prevent zoophilic infection are available for cattle, horses, cats and dogs (10) .

PROPHYLAXIS: None currently available, but some studies suggest silver nanoparticles as a prophylactic agent (24).

SECTION VI - LABORATORY HAZARDS

LABORATORY-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS: As of 1976, there were 161 reported cases of dermatomycosis, most frequently associated with T. mentagrophytes. Most were acquired through contact with naturally or experimentally infected laboratory animals (mice, rabbits, guinea pigs) and their bedding. Infections are rare by handling cultures (one case). Processing of clinical material has not been associated with laboratory infections (17) .

SOURCES/SPECIMENS: This pathogen can be found in keratinized tissues of infected human and animal hosts and medium contaminated by the tissue (1). It can also be found in the contaminated soil and on laboratory instruments (25).

PRIMARY HAZARDS: Contact with infected animals and their bedding or environment are primary hazards, along with institutions where communal hygiene activities occur. The cultured pathogen is an obvious hazard(14) .

SPECIAL HAZARDS: None

SECTION VII - EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION

RISK GROUP CLASSIFICATION: Risk Group 2 pathogens (26). The risk group applies to the Microsporum spp. and Trichophyton spp. genus as a whole, and may not apply to every species within the genus.

CONTAINMENT REQUIREMENTS: Containment Level 2 facilities, equipment, and operational practices for work involving infectious or potentially infectious materials, animals, and cultures. These containment requirements apply to the Microsporum spp. and Trichophyton spp. genus as a whole, and may not apply to each species within the genus.

PROTECTIVE CLOTHING: Lab coat. Gloves when direct skin contact with infected materials or animals is unavoidable. Eye protection must be used where there is a known or potential risk or exposure to splashes (27).

OTHER PRECAUTIONS: All procedures that may produce aerosols, or involve high concentrations or large volumes should be conducted in a biological safety cabinet (BSC). The use of needles, syringes, and other sharp objects should be strictly limited. Additional precautions should be considered with work involving animals or large scale activities.) (27).

SECTION VIII - HANDLING AND STORAGE

SPILLS: Allow aerosols to settle and, wearing protective clothing, gently cover spill with paper towels and apply suitable disinfectant, starting at the perimeter and working towards the centre. Allow sufficient contact time before clean up (27).

DISPOSAL: All material should be decontaminated before disposal with steam sterilization, incineration or chemical disinfection (27).

STORAGE: Samples and biological material should be store in appropriately labelled and sealed containers (27).

SECTION IX - REGULATORY AND OTHER INFORMATION

REGULATORY INFORMATION: The import, transport, and use of pathogens in Canada is regulated under many regulatory bodies, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment Canada, and Transport Canada. Users are responsible for ensuring they are compliant with all relevant acts, regulations, guidelines, and standards.

UPDATED: July 2010

PREPARED BY: Pathogen Regulation Directorate, Public Health Agency of Canada.

Although the information, opinions and recommendations contained in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet are compiled from sources believed to be reliable, we accept no responsibility for the accuracy, sufficiency, or reliability or for any loss or injury resulting from the use of the information. Newly discovered hazards are frequent and this information may not be completely up to date.

Copyright ©

Public Health Agency of Canada, 2010

Canada

REFERENCES:

  1. Weitzman, I., & Summerbell, R. C. (1995). The dermatophytes. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 8(2), 240-259.
  2. Degreef, H. (2008). Clinical forms of dermatophytosis (ringworm infection). Mycopathologia, 166(5-6), 257-265. doi:10.1007/s11046-008-9101-8.
  3. Puttick, L. (1990). Sickness absence due to skin disorders in the coal mining industry. The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine, 40(1), 23-28.
  4. Nisbet, C., Yarim, G. F., Ciftci, G., Arslan, H. H., & Ciftci, A. (2006). Effects of trichophytosis on serum zinc levels in calves. Biological Trace Element Research, 113(3), 273-280. doi:10.1385/BTER:113:3:273.
  5. Rai, M. K. (1988). A rare microsporosis from Satpura region: identity and discussion on its taxonomy. Hindustan Antibiotics Bulletin, 30(3-4), 87-89.
  6. White, T. C., Oliver, B. G., Graser, Y., & Henn, M. R. (2008). Generating and testing molecular hypotheses in the dermatophytes. Eukaryotic Cell, 7(8), 1238-1245. doi:10.1128/EC.00100-08
  7. Summerbell, R. C., Weitzman, I., & Padhye, A. A. (2007). Trichophyton, Microsporum, Epidermophyton, and Agents of Superficial Mycoses. Manual of clinical microbiology (9th ed., pp. 1874). Washington: ASM press.
  8. Seebacher, C., Bouchara, J. P., & Mignon, B. (2008). Updates on the epidemiology of dermatophyte infections. Mycopathologia, 166(5-6), 335-352. doi:10.1007/s11046-008-9100-9.
  9. Hainer, B. L. (2003). Dermatophyte infections. American Family Physician, 67(1), 101-108.
  10. Lund, A., & Deboer, D. J. (2008). Immunoprophylaxis of dermatophytosis in animals. Mycopathologia, 166(5-6), 407-424. doi:10.1007/s11046-008-9111-6.
  11. Fleming, D., & Hunt, D. (2006). Biological safety: principles and practices (4th ed.). Washington: ASM press.
  12. Pan American Sanitary Bureau. (2001). In Pan American Sanitary Bureau (Ed.), Zoonoses and communicable disease between man and animals (3rd ed.). Washington DC: Pan american health organization.
  13. Raccurt, C. P., Dorsainvil, D., Boncy, M., Boncy, J., & Auguste, G. (2009). The emergence of Trichophyton tonsurans in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Medical Mycology : Official Publication of the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology, 47(2), 197-200. doi:10.1080/13693780802192676.
  14. Krauss, H., WEber, A., Appel, M., Enders, B., Isenberg, H. D., Schiefer, H. G., Slenczka, W., & von Graevenitz, A. (2003). Fungal Zoonoses. Zoonoses. Infectious Diseases Transmissible from Animals to Humans (3rd ed., pp. pp. 257-259.). Washington, D.C.: ASM press.
  15. Lenhart, K., Merkunova, A., Walterova, D., Latinak, J., & Kozeny, M. (1989). Ketoconazole-resistant mutants of Microsporum gypseum. II. Characteristics of mutants. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Facultatis Medicae, 122, 71-82.
  16. Barros, M. E., & Hamdan, J. S. (2005). Determination of susceptibility/resistance to antifungal drugs of Trichophyton mentagrophytes isolates by a macrodilution method. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 51(11), 983-987. doi:10.1139/w05-100.
  17. Collins, C. H., & Kennedy, D. A. (1999). Laboratory acquired infections. Laboratory acquired infections: History, incidence, causes and prevention (4th ed., pp. 1-37). Woburn, MA: BH.
  18. Menetrez, M. Y., Foarde, K. K., Dean, T. R., & Betancourt, D. A. (2010). The effectiveness of UV irradiation on vegetative bacteria and fungi surface contamination. Chemical Engineering Journal, 157(2-3), 443-450. doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.12.004.
  19. da Silva, M., Moraes, A. M. L., Nishikawa, M. M., Gatti, M. J. A., Vallim de Alencar, M. A., Brandão, L. E., & Nóbrega, A. (2006). Inactivation of fungi from deteriorated paper materials by radiation. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 57(3), 163-167. doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.02.003 .
  20. Wu, Y., & Yao, M.Inactivation of bacteria and fungus aerosols using microwave irradiation. Journal of Aerosol Science, In Press, Corrected Proof doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.04.004.
  21. Csucos, M., & Csucos, C. (1999). Microbiological obseration of water and wastewater. United States: CRC Press.
  22. Dvorak, J., Hubalek, Z., & Otcenasek, M. (1968). Survival of dermatophytes in human skin scales. Archives of Dermatology, 98(5), 540-542.
  23. Anderson, J. H. (1979). In vitro survival of human pathogenic fungi in seawater. Sabouraudia, 17(1), 1-12.
  24. Kim, K. J., Sung, W. S., Moon, S. K., Choi, J. S., Kim, J. G., & Lee, D. G. (2008). Antifungal effect of silver nanoparticles on dermatophytes. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 18(8), 1482-1484.
  25. Mahmoudabadi, A. Z. (2007). Laboratory instrument contamination with dermatophytes - a risk for dermatophytosis. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 44(1), 112-113. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02025.x
  26. An Act to promote safety and security with respect to human pathogens and toxins, (2009).
  27. Public Health Agency of Canada. (2004). In Best M., Graham M. L., Leitner R., Ouellette M. and Ugwu K. (Eds.), Laboratory Biosafety Guidelines (3rd ed.). Canada: Public Health Agency of Canada.