CIPARS 2007 - Final Report

Appendix B – Additional Tables continued

The following information are important for the interpretation of tables presenting results on the distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC; Appendix B.1 and B.2).

• Roman numerals I to IV indicate the ranking of human medicine importance as outlined by the Veterinary Drugs Directorate.
• The unshaded fields indicate the range tested for each antimicrobial in the plate configuration.
• Bold red numbers indicate the percentage of isolates that were resistant to the antimicrobial according to the predefined resistance breakpoint.
• Numbers to the right of the highest concentration in the tested range (i.e. bold red numbers in shaded fields) represent the percentage of isolates with growth in all wells within the tested range, indicating that the actual MICs were greater than the tested range of concentrations.
• Numbers at the lowest concentration in the tested range (i.e. blue numbers at the far left in unshaded fields) represent the percentage of isolates susceptible to the antimicrobial at the indicated or lower concentrations.
• Solid bars represent resistance breakpoints.
• Dotted bars represent susceptibility breakpoints.
• MIC 50 = MIC at which 50% of isolates were inhibited.
• MIC 90 = MIC at which 90% of isolates were inhibited.
• %R = Percentage of isolates that were resistant.

Table B.2.12. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Salmonella isolates from pigs; Farm Surveillance, 2007.

Table B.2.12. - Text Equivalent

Table B.2.13. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Salmonella isolates from pigs; Abattoir Surveillance, 2007.

Table B.2.13. - Text Equivalent

Table B.2.14. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Salmonella isolates from pigs; Surveillance of Animal Clinical Isolates, 2007.

Table B.2.14. - Text Equivalent

Table B.2.15. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Escherichia coli isolates from pigs; Farm Surveillance, 2007.

Table B.2.15. - Text Equivalent

Table B.2.16. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Escherichia coli isolates from pigs; Abattoir Surveillance, 2007.

Table B.2.16. - Text Equivalent

Table B.2.17. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Escherichia coli isolates from pork, by province; Retail Meat Surveillance, 2007.

Table B.2.17. - Text Equivalent

Table B.2.18. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Enterococcus isolates from pigs, by Enterococcus species; Farm Surveillance, 2007.

^a Resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin and lincomycin is not reported for E. faecalis because E. faecalis is intrinsically resistant to these antimicrobials.

Table B.2.18. - Text Equivalent

Table B.2.19. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Salmonella isolates from turkeys; Surveillance of Animal Clinical Isolates, 2007.

Table B.2.19. - Text Equivalent

Table B.2.20. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Salmonella isolates from horses; Surveillance of Animal Clinical Isolates, 2007.

Table B.2.20. - Text Equivalent

Table B.2.21. Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; μg/mL) for antimicrobials in Salmonella isolates from feed; Surveillance of Feed and Feed ingredients, 2007.

Table B.2.21. - Text Equivalent

B.3 Antimicrobial Use in Humans

Table B.3.1. Total volume of active ingredients of oral antimicrobials dispensed by retail pharmacies in Canada, 2000–2007.

		ATC Class	Total amount of active ingredients (Kg)
			2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007
I	J01CR	Combinations of penicillins, including ß-lactamase inhibitors	7,148.28	7,295.71	7,114.06	7,492.67	7,491.56	8,414.31	8,985.63	9,798.46
	J01DD	Third-generation cephalosporins	441.47	412.56	372.50	321.45	275.37	282.37	274.85	303.36
	J01MA	Fluoroquinolones	17,387.35	17,569.37	17,718.15	18,469.28	18,738.69	18,781.31	19,348.84	19,788.30
	J01XA	Glycopeptides	25.90	28.25	32.23	40.56	70.36	79.17	75.77	83.99
	J01XD	Imidazole	NA	4,808.34	4,927.11	5,126.54	5,237.51	5,311.07	5,563.98	5,585.72
	J01XX	Linezolid	NA	1.55	4.91	10.82	17.29	23.26	22.44	25.35
II	J01CA	Penicillins with extended spectrum	57,566.37	56,004.37	53,404.23	53,132.75	51,471.46	53,138.73	53,534.56	53,440.34
	J01CE	ß-lactamase sensitive penicillins	15,079.86	14,253.92	13,722.26	13,802.13	12,916.80	13,174.53	13,139.62	12,879.95
	J01CF	ß-lactamase resistant penicillins	8,351.00	8,004.27	7,376.34	7,135.18	6,596.38	5,861.06	5,604.86	5,157.50
	J01DB	First-generation cephalosporins	16,693.30	17,295.99	18,358.43	19,683.24	20,312.94	21,585.02	22,981.10	23,345.75
	J01DC	Second-generation cephalosporins	11,099.40	9,857.59	8,712.26	8,570.41	8,277.23	8,410.81	7,937.42	7,423.47
	J01EE	Combinations of sulfonamides and trimethoprim, Including derivatives	26,196.41	23,815.65	21,549.97	20,179.30	19,226.17	18,858.59	18,520.09	18,079.24
	J01FA	Macrolides	25,163.98	23,844.04	21,665.44	22,138.28	21,168.11	22,746.49	22,646.85	22,513.36
	J01FF	Lincosamides	3,289.35	3,590.12	3,896.00	4,272.26	4,441.95	4,499.59	4,976.71	5,303.12
	J01GB	Aminoglycosides	29.66	0.36	0.04	0.00	0.01	NA	0.05	0.20
	J01MB	Other quinolones, excluding fluoroquinolones	76.31	62.19	52.12	45.35	41.87	1.05	0.26	0.02
	J01RA	Sulfonamide combinations, excluding trimethoprim	2,745.17	1,910.05	1,251.28	843.14	548.87	494.05	418.86	305.33
	J01XC	Steroid antimicrobials	34.79	39.06	35.54	37.27	36.64	41.91	42.73	34.21
III	J01AA	Tetracyclines	14,112.37	13,169.24	12,595.12	11,902.77	11,050.90	10,709.61	10,298.35	9,664.96
	J01BA	Amphenicols	0.78	0.99	0.20	NA	0.06	0.01	NA	NA
	J01EA	Trimethoprim, including derivatives	315.71	297.29	310.34	307.34	288.32	265.98	265.88	260.48
	J01EB	Short-acting sulfonamides	105.38	13.45	0.88	1.04	1.02	0.26	0.13	0.03
	J01EC	Intermediate-acting sulfonamides	28.08	4.48	4.77	5.55	4.51	2.93	2.27	2.36
	J01XE	Nitrofuran derivatives	935.24	981.97	1,019.51	1,073.19	1,152.40	1,210.89	1,323.77	1,387.68
	J01XX	Fosfomycin	64.76	74.26	48.00	35.71	26.28	20.78	17.80	11.01
NC	J01XX	Methenamine	389.51	356.69	350.35	296.88	282.20	253.34	249.14	256.85
	J01	Total	207,280.44	203,691.77	194,522.04	194,923.13	189,674.87	194,167.12	196,231.93	195,651.06

Roman numerals I to III indicate the ranking of antimicrobials based on importance in human medicine as outlined by the Veterinary Drugs Directorate.
ATC = Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical. NA = Not available. NC = Not classified.

B.4 Summary Tables for Human and Agri-Food Data

Table B.4.1. Summary of selected resistance patterns involving multiple antimicrobials in bacterial isolates from humans and the agri-food sector; CIPARS, 2007.

Species	Bacterial species	Number (%) of isolates/Serovar total
		Number (%) of isolates/ Salmonella total
		Susceptible to all antimicrobials	Resistant to A2C-AMP	ACSSuT	AKSSuT	ACKSSuT	A2C+ ACSSuT	A2C+ AKSSuT	A2C+ ACKSSuT
Surveillance des isolats cliniques humains
Humans	Salmonella Enteritidis (n = 910)	795/910 (87%)			1/910 (< 1%)
		795/3,308 (24%)			1/3,308 (<1%)
	S. Heidelberg (n = 319)	193/319 (60%)	46/319 (14%)				1/319 (< 1%)
		193/3,308 (6%)	46/3,308 (1%)				1/3,308 (< 1%)
	S. Newport (n = 127)	113/127 (89%)		1/127 (1%)			2/127 (2%)		2/127 (2%)
		113/3,308 (3%)		1/3,308 (<1%)			2/3,308 (<1%)		2/3,308 (<1%)
	S. Typhi (n = 156)	30/156 (19%)		16/156 (10%)
		30/3,308 (1%)		16/3,308 (< 1%)
	S. Paratyphi A and B (n = 45)	12/45 (27%)		2/45 (4%)
		12/3,308 (<1%)		2/3,308 (<1%)
	S. Typhimurium (n = 658)	436/658 (66%)	3/658 (< 1%)	73/658 (11%)	7/658 (1%)	12/658 (2%)	6/658 (1%)
		436/3,308 (13%)	3/3,308 (< 1%)	73/3,308 (2%)	7/3,308 (< 1%)	12/3,308 (< 1%)	6/3,308 (< 1%)
	Other Serovars (n = 1,093)	847/1,093 (77%)	8/1,093 (1%)	3/1,093 (< 1%)	2/1,093 (< 1%)	2/1,093 (< 1%)
		847/3,308 (26%)	8/3,308 (<1%)	3/3,308 (<1%)	2/3,308 (<1%)	2/3,308 (<1%)
Farm Surveillance
Pigs	Escherichia coli (n=1,575)	219/1,575 (14%)	4/1,575 (<1%)	45/1,575 (3%)	32/1,575 (3%)	14/1,575 (<1%)	1/1,575 (< 1%)
	S. Derby (n = 21)	7/21 (33%) 7/110 (6%)			1/21 (5%) 1/110 (1%)
	S. I 4:i:- (n = 7)	3/7 (43%) 3/110 (3%)		1/ 7 (14%) 1/110 (1%)		3/7 (43%) 3/110 (3%)
	S. Typhimurium (n = 10)	7/10 (70%) 7/110 (6%)		1/10 (10%) 1/110 (1%)		5/10 (50%) 5/110 (5%)
	S. Typhimurium var. 5- (n = 22)	14/22 (64%) 14/110 (13%)		6/22 (27%) 6/110 (5%)	2/22 (9%) 2/110 (2%)	2/22 (9%) 2/110 (2%)
	S. Typhimurium var. 5- (n = 22)	0/2 (0%) 0/110 (0%)		1/2 (50%) 1/110 (1%)		1/2 (50%) 1/110 (1%)
Abattoir Surveillance
Beef cattle	E. coli (n = 188)	111/188 (59%)
Chickens	E. coli (n = 180)	42/180 (23%)	35/180 (19%)				7/180 (4%)	3/180 (2%)
	S. Enteritidis (n = 20)	19/20 (95%) 19/206 (9%)
	S. Heidelberg (n = 37)	23/37 (62%) 23/206 (11%)	7/37 (19%) 7/206 (3%)
	S. Typhimurium (n = 11)	6/11 (55%) 6/206 (3%)	2/11 (18%) 2/206 (< 1%)	3/11 (27%) 3/206 (1%)
	Other serovars (n = 138)	46/138 (33%) 46/206 (22%)	13/138 (9%) 13/206 (6%)
Pigs	E. coli (n = 93)	17/93 (18%)	1/93 (1%)	2/93 (2%)	4/93 (4%)	1/93 (1%)
	S. Heidelberg (n = 3)
	S. Typhimurium (n = 32)	4/32 (13%) 4/105 (4%)		17/32 (53%) 17/105 (16%)		4/32 (13%) 4/105 (4%)
	Other serovars (n = 70)	36/70 (51%) 36/105 (34%)				2/70 (3%) 2/105 (2%)			1/70 (1%) 1/105 (< 1%)
Retail Meat Surveillance
Beef	E. coli (n = 501)	432/501 (86%)		1/501 (< 1%)	1/501 (< 1%)	1/501 (< 1%)	1/501 (< 1%)
Chicken	E. coli (n = 402)	107/402 (27%)	66/402 (16%)	2/402 (< 1%)	8/402 (2%)	1/402 (< 1%)	3/402 (< 1%)	1/402 (< 1%)	1/402 (< 1%)
	S. Enteritidis (n = 17)	17/17 (100%) 17/346 (5%)
	S. Heidelberg (n = 87)	48/87 (55%) 48/346 (14%)	16/87 (18%) 16/346 (5%)
	S. Typhimurium (n = 12)	10/12 (83%) 10/346 (3%)		1/12 (8%) 1/346 (1%)
	Other serovars (n = 230)	92/230 (40%) 92/346 (27%)	18/230 (8%) 18/346 (5%)
Pork	E. coli (n = 297)	162/297 (55%)	2/297 (< 1%)	3/297 (1%)	3/297 (1%)
Surveillance of Animal Clinical Isolates
Cattle	S. Heidelberg (n = 1)	1/1 (100%) 1/140 (<1%)
	S. Typhimurium (n = 47)	19/47 (40%) 19/140 (14%)		7/47 (15%) 7/140 (5%)		10/47 (21%) 10/140 (7%)	1/47 (2%) 1/140 (< 1%)		2/47 (4%) 2/140 (1%)
	Other serovars(n = 92)	85/92 (92%) 85/140 (61%)
Chickens	S. Enteritidis (n = 36)	36/36 (100%) 36/105 (34%)
	S. Heidelberg (n = 21)	11/21 (52%) 11/105 (10%)	8/21 (38%) 8/105 (8%)
	S. Typhimurium (n = 12)	11/12 (92%) 11/105 (10%)		1/12 (8%) 1/105 (<1%)
	Other serovars (n = 36)	19/36 (53%) 19/105 (18%)	5/36 (14%) 5/105 (5%)					1/36 (3%) 1/105 (<1%)
Pigs	S. Enteritidis (n = 2)	2/2 (100%) 2/187 (1%)
	S. Heidelberg (n = 1)
	S. Typhimurium (n = 104)	8/104 (8%) 8/187 (4%)		30/104 (29%) 30/187 (16%)	6/104 (6%) 6/187 (3%)	23/104 (22%) 23/187 (12%)
	Other serovars (n = 80)	36/80 (45%) 36/187 (19%)	1/80 (1%) 1/187 (< 1%)	3/80 (4%) 3/187 (2%)	4/80 (5%) 4/187 (2%)	3/80 (4%) 3/187 (2%)	2/80 (3%) 2/187 (1%)		1/80 (< 1%) 1/187 (< 1%)
Turkeys	S. Enteritidis (n = 2)	2/2 (100%) 2/49 (4%)
	S. Heidelberg (n = 8)	1/8 (13%) 1/49 (2%)	2/8 (25%) 2/49 (4%)
	S. Typhimurium (n = 11)	1/11 (9%) 1/49 (2%)	10/11 (91%) 10/49 (20%)
	Autres sérotypes(n = 28)	3/28 (11%) 3/49 (6%)	9/28 (32%) 9/49 (18%)				1/28 (4%) 1/49 (2%)	2/28 (7%) 2/49 (4%)
Horses	S. Heidelberg (n = 54)
	S. Newport (n = 2)	2/2 (100%) 2/67 (3%)
	S . Typhimurium (n = 5)	3/5 (60%) 3/67 (4%)		1/5 (20%) 1/66 (2%)	1/5 (20%) 1/66 (20%)
	Autres sérotypes(n = 6)	6/7 (100%) 6/67 (7%)

Results for each of the above specific patterns exclude isolates resistant to one of the other patterns presented in this table but may include isolates resistant to other antimicrobials. Blank cells represent values equal to zero (0%). For the purpose of this table, S. Typhimurium var. 5- results were combined with S. Typhimurium results (except for Farm Surveillance) to harmonize serovar classification with that of the National Microbiology Laboratory.

Table B.4.2. Summary of antimicrobial resistance in the most common isolates of Salmonella serovars from humans and the agri-food sector; CIPARS, 2007.

	Most common serovars
Species	Total (n)	Susceptible to antimicrobials	1 to 4 antimicrobials in resistance pattern	5 to 8 antimicrobials in resistance pattern	9 to 15 antimicrobials in resistance pattern
Surveillance of Human Clinical Isolates
Humans	n = 3308	n = 2356	n = 763	n = 179	n = 10
	Enteritidis (910)	Enteritidis (725)	Enteritidis (178)	Typhimurium (105)	Typhimurium (6)
	Typhimurium (658)	Typhimurium (436)	Heidelberg (121)	Typhi (32)	Newport (3)
	Heidelberg (319)	Heidelberg (193)	Typhimurium (111)	Enteritidis (7)	Choleraesuis (1)
	Typhi (156)	Newport (113)	Typhi (94)	Heidelberg (5)
	Newport (127)	Thompson (92)	Hadar (72)	I 4,(5),12:i:- (4)
	Thompson (94)	Oranienburg (77)	Paratyphi A (31)	Saintpaul (4)
	I 4,(5),12:i:- (83)	I 5,(5),12:i:- (59)	Mbandaka (23)	Stanley (3)
	Oranienburg (78)	Infantis (56)	I 4,(5),12:i:- (20)	Newport (2)
Farm Surveillance
Pigs	n = 110	n = 49	n = 36	n = 25
	Typhimurium var. 5- (22)	Infantis (10)	Typhimurium var. 5- (8)	Typhimurium var. 5- (10)
	Derby (21)	Derby (7)	Typhimurium (3)	Typhimurium (6)
	Infantis (11)	Typhimurium var. 5- (4)	I 4:i:- (3)	I 4:i:- (4)
	Typhimurium (10)	Orion (3)	California (2)
	I 4:i:- (7)	California (3)	Brandenburg (2)
	California (4)	I 4:-:- (2)	Mbandaka (2)
	Heidelberg (4)	Johannesburg (2)
	Brandenburg (3)	Krefeld (2)
	Mbandaka (3)	London (2)
	Orion (3)	Muenchen (2)
		Heidelberg (2)
Abattoir Surveillance
Chickens	n = 206	n = 94	n = 98	n = 14
	Kentucky (89)	Heidelberg (23)	Kentucky (57)	Kentucky (11)
	Heidelberg (37)	Kentucky (21)	Heidelberg (14)	Typhimurium (2)
	Enteritidis (20)	Enteritidis (19)	Hadar (9)	Typhimurium var. 5- (1)
	Hadar (10)	Kiambu (4)	I4:i:- (4)
	I4:i:- (7)	Thompson (4)	Kiambu (2)
	Typhimurium (7)	Typhimurium (4)
	Kiambu (6)	I4:i:- (3)
		Agona (2)
		Mbandaka (2)
		Typhimurium var. 5- (2)
Pigs	n = 105	n = 40	n = 38	n = 26	n = 1
	Derby (18)	Brandenburg (5)	Derby (15)	Typhimurium (12)	I4:i:- (1)
	Typhimurium (16)	Infantis (5)	Typhimurium var. 5- (5)	Typhimurium var. 5- (10)
	Typhimurium var. 5- (16)	London (5)	Heidelberg (3)	I4:i:- (1)
	Brandenburg (6)	Derby (3)	Agona (2)	Mbandaka (1)
	Infantis (6)	Typhimurium (3)	California (2)	Ohio (1)
	London (5)	Give (2)	I4:d:- (2)	Senftenberg (1)
	Mbandaka (4)	Manhattan (2)	Krefeld (2)
	Agona (3)	Mbandaka (2)	Altona (1)
	California (3)	Agona (1)	Bovismorbificans (1)
	Heidelberg (3)	Bredeney (1)	Brandenburg (1)
	Krefeld (3)	California (1)	Infantis (1)
		Havana (1)	Mbandaka (1)
		I6,7:-:5 (1)	Typhimurium (1)
		I6,7:-:z15 (1)	Worthington (1)
		Kentucky (1)
		Krefeld (1)
		Litchfield (1)
		Muenchen (1)
		Orion (1)
		Typhimurium var. 5- (1)
		Worthington (1)
Retail Meat Surveillance
Chicken	n = 346	n = 167	n = 169	n = 10
	Kentucky (110)	Heidelberg (48)	Kentucky (77)	Kentucky (6)
	Heidelberg (87)	Kentucky (27)	Heidelberg (37)	Heidelberg (2)
	Hadar (22)	Enteritidis (17)	Hadar (21)	Kiambu (1)
	Enteritidis (17)	Thompson (16)	Schwarzengrund (7)	Typhimurium (1)
	Thompson (16)	Infantis (11)	Kiambu (6)
	Kiambu (14)	Typhimurium (9)
	Infantis (11)	Kiambu (7)
	Typhimurium (10)	Agona (4)
	Schwarzengrund (9)
Surveillance of Animal Clinical Isolates
Cattle	n = 140	n = 105	n = 13	n = 20	n = 2
	Typhimurium (35)	Kentucky (28)	Typhimurium var. 5- (4)	Typhimurium (14)	Typhimurium var5- (2)
	Kentucky (29)	Typhimurium (19)	Anatum (3)	Typhimurium var. 5- (6)
	Cerro (13)	Cerro (12)	Typhimurium (2)
	I6,14,18:-:- (11)	I6,14,18:-:- (11)	Cerro (1)
	Typhimurium var. 5- (10)	Thompson (6)	Hadar (1)
	Thompson (6)	I4:i:- (4)	I4:i:- (1)
	I4:i:- (5)	Schwarzengrund (4)	Kentucky (1)
	Schwarzengrund (4)	Infantis (3)
	Anatum (3)	Montevideo (3)
	Infantis (3)
	Montevideo (3)
Chickens	n = 105	n = 77	n = 24	n = 3	n = 1
	Enteritidis (36)	Enteritidis (36)	Heidelberg (10)	Kentucky (1)	Bredeney (1)
	Heidelberg (21)	Heidelberg (11)	I8,20:-:z6 (3)	Senftenberg (1)
	Kentucky (12)	Typhimurium (9)	Kentucky (3)	Typhimurium (1)
	Typhimurium (10)	Kentucky (8)	I4:i:- (2)
	I4:i:- (6)	I4:i:- (4)	Infantis (2)
	Infantis (4)	I-:gm:- (2)	Braenderup (1)
	I8,20:-:z6 (3)	Infantis (2)	Hadar (1)
		Typhimurium var. 5- (2)	IRough-O:k:- (1)
			Thompson (1)
Pigs	n = 187	n = 46	n = 59	n = 79	n = 3
	Typhimurium (66)	Derby (9)	Typhimurium (21)	Typhimurium (39)	Ohio (2)
	Typhimurium var. 5- (38)	Infantis (9)	Derby (12)	Typhimurium var. 5- (25)	Livingstone (1)
	Derby (25)	Typhimurium (6)	Typhimurium var. 5- (11)	Derby (4)
	Infantis (9)	Brandenburg (3)	Schwarzengrund (3)	Albany (2)
	Brandenburg (6)	Enteritidis (2)	Agona (2)	Ohio (2)
	Schwarzengrund (5)	Schwarzengrund (2)	Brandenburg (2)
	Mbandaka (4)	Tennessee (2)	Mbandaka (2)
	Ohio (4)	Typhimurium var. 5- (2)
		Worthington (2)
		Alachua (1)
		Anatum (1)
		Berta (1)
		Havana (1)
		I-:r:5 (1)
		I6,7:-:l,w (1)
		London (1)
		Mbandaka (1)
		Soerenga (1)
Turkeys	n = 49	n = 7	n = 31	n = 8	n = 3
	Typhimurium (10)	Enteritidis (2)	Typhimurium (9)	Senftenberg (3)	Bredeney (2)
	Heidelberg (8)	Brandenburg (1)	Heidelberg (5)	Agona (2)	Senftenberg (1)
	Senftenberg (7)	Heidelberg (1)	Hadar (4)	Heidelberg (2)
	Agona (5)	Senftenberg (1)	Agona (3)	Typhimurium (1)
	Hadar (4)	Thompson (1)	Anatum (2)
	Anatum (2)	Typhimurium var. 5- (1)	Derby (2)
	Bredeney (2)		I4:-:- (2)
	Derby (2)		Senftenberg (2)
	Enteritidis (2)		Albany (1)
	I4:-:- (2)		I-:eh:5 (1)
	Albany (1)
	Brandenburg (1)
	I-:eh:5 (1)
	Thompson (1)
	Typhimurium var. 5- (1)
Horses	n = 67	n = 11	n = 3	n = 53
	Heidelberg (54)	Typhimurium (3)	Heidelberg (3)	Heidelberg (51)
	Typhimurium (5)	Newport (2)		Typhimurium (2)
	Newport (2)	Rubislaw (2)
	Rubislaw (2)	Give (1)
		Hartford (1)
		I4,[5],12:b:- (1)
		Thompson (1)

Most common serovars were those representing 2% or more of the isolates within each surveillance component and species.

Table B.4.3. Recovery rates for bacterial species of isolates from various surveillance components of the agri-food sector; CIPARS, 2002−2007.

CIPARS Component/ Animal species	Province	Year	% Isolates recovered          Number of isolates recovered/number of samples submitted
			Escherichia coli		Salmonella		Campylobacter		Enterococcus
Farm Surveillance
Pigs		2006	99%	459/462	20%	94/462			81%	374/462
		2007	100%	612/612	21%	136/612			81%	495/612
Abattoir Surveillance
Beef cattle		2002	97%	76/78	1%	3/78
		2003	97%	155/159	< 1%	1/114
		2004	98%	167/170
		2005	97%	122/126			66%	23/35
		2006	100%	150/150			36%	31/87
		2007	99%	188/190			39%	75/190
Pigs		2002	97%	38/39	27%	103/385
		2003	98%	153/155	28%	395/1393
		2004	99%	142/143	38%	270/703
		2005	99%	163/164	42%	212/486
		2006	98%	115/117	40%	145/359
		2007	98%	93/95	36%	105/296
Chickens		2002	100%	40/40	13%	25/195
		2003	97%	150/153	16%	126/803
		2004	99%	130/131	16%	142/893
		2005	99%	218/220	18%	200/1103
		2006	100%	166/166	23%	187/824
		2007	99%	180/181	25%	204/808
Retail Meat Surveillance
Beef	British Columbia	2005	93%	27/29
		2007	79%	49/62
	Saskatch- ewan	2005	79%	120/151
		2006	76%	123/161
		2007	78%	118/151
	Ontario	2003	66%	101/154	2%	2/84	3%	2/76	91%	69/76
		2004	80%	190/237
		2005	81%	184/227
		2006	81%	189/235
		2007	71%	184/227
	Québec	2003	57%	84/147	0%	0/33	0%	0/33	80%	28/35
		2004	56%	137/245
		2005	56%	126/225
		2006	50%	109/215
		2007	68%	147/216
Pork	British Columbia	2005	31%	10/32
		2007	29%	23/79	1%	1/79
		2008	30%	44/148	2%	3/148
	Saskatch- ewan	2005	30%	48/162
		2006	30%	49/165	2%	3/134
		2007	25%	38/154	2%	3/154
	Ontario	2003	58%	90/154	1%	1/93	0%	0/76	87%	66/76
		2004	71%	198/279
		2005	59%	179/303
		2006	59%	182/311	< 1%	1/255
		2007	54%	172/320	2%	6/319
	Québec	2003	42%	61/147	3%	1/32	9%	3/32	82%	28/34
		2004	38%	109/290
		2005	26%	79/300
		2006	20%	57/287	0%	0/232
		2007	22%	64/287	1%	3/288
Chicken	British Columbia	2005	95%	19/20	13%	5/39	69%	27/39	100%	20/20
		2007	98%	42/43	22%a	18/81	35%	28/80	100%	34/34
	Saskatch- ewan	2005	98%	81/83	14%	21/153	37%	53/145	98%	83/85
		2006	98%	85/86	16%	25/153	33%	51/155	98%	85/87
		2007	97%	75/77	31%a	43/141	35%	49/141	100%	77/77
	Ontario	2003	95%	137/144	16%	27/167	47%	78/166	99%	143/144
		2004	95%	150/158	17%	54/315	45%	143/315	100%	158/158
		2005	95%	145/153	9%	26/303	40%	120/303	99%	150/152
		2006	97%	152/156	12%	36/311	34%	104/311	98%	154/156
		2007	98%	157/161	54%a	172/320	37%	117/320	100%	161/161
	Québec	2003	89%	112/126	16%	29/171	55%	94/170	100%	125/125
		2004	96%	157/161	17%	53/320	50%	161/322	100%	161/161
		2005	95%	142/149	9%	26/300	34%	103/299	100%	150/150
		2006	94%	135//144	12%	33/288	35%	100/288	100%	144/144
		2007	90%	129/144	40%a	113/287	21%	59/287	99%	143/144

Results in the gray-shaded areas indicate isolates that were recovered but not submitted for antimicrobial-susceptibility testing.

^a Enhancement to Salmonella recovery method explains higher prevalence in isolates from retail chicken in 2007 than in prior years.

Table B.4.4. Distribution of animal isolates of Salmonella, by province; Surveillance of Animal Clinical Isolates, 2007.

Species	Alberta	Saskatchewan	Manitoba	Ontario	Québec	New Brunswick	Nova Scotia
	Number (%) of isolates
Cattle (n = 140)	3 (2)	1 (1)	6 (4)	90 (64)	40 (29)
Chickens (n = 105)	10 (10)		5 (5)	67 (64)	22 (21)	1 (1)
Pigs (n = 187)	3 (2)	3 (2)	9 (5)	85 (45)	79 (42)		8 (5)
Turkeys (n = 49)	3 (6)			19 (39)	26 (53)		1 (2)
Horses (n = 67)	2 (3)			63 (94)	2 (3)