Active living at work benefits employers and employees alike, improving:
A significant amount of research on the impact of physical activity in the workplace environment has been undertaken and more than 200 studies about workplace wellness initiatives have been reviewed.
A majority of these studies did not involve control groups and therefore the data can not be validated scientifically. However, the conclusions attained in these studies can be used to guide strategic thinking and decision-making.
The evidence does suggest that an organization may reap significant financial and other benefits from the introduction of workplace wellness programs that include a physical activity component.
Overall, most research into health promotion and disease prevention in the workplace indicates that such interventions do indeed improve health, and are cost-effective.
Many well-known businesses have introduced physical activity programs and have documented their results. For example:
| Canadian Companies | U. S. Companies | U. S. Companies cont'd |
|---|---|---|
| Alcan | Adolph Coors | Prudential Insurance |
| BC Hydro & Accenture Business Services of BC | American Airlines | Steelcase |
| BEI/PECAL | AT&T | Tenneco |
| Canada Life Assurance | Boeing Aircraft | Travellers Insurance |
| Canada Post | City of Birmingham | Union Pacific |
Canada Safeway |
Control Data |
Xerox |
DuPont |
||
Electrohome |
Equitable Life Insurance |
|
Imperial Oil Resources |
General Electric |
|
Magna Corporation |
General Mills |
|
Malette Inc. |
General Motors |
|
Goodyear |
||
Honeywell |
||
Metro Toronto Municipal Government |
Johnson & Johnson |
|
Nortel |
Kimberley Clark |
|
Saskatchewan Provincial Government |
Mesa Petroleum |
|
Shell Canada |
Metropolitan Life |
|
NASA |
||
Pepsico |
||
For more information about companies that are walking the talk when it comes to promoting active living at work, please visit the Business Case Studies & Template section. |
||
Most recent studies suggest that participation in regular physical activity plays a positive role in improving employee health.
The following results, linked to risk factors and risk precursors, have been documented:
Regular physical activity has been linked to:
An inverse relationship exists between blood pressure and physical activity, independent of overweight or obesity. Increased physical activity helps lower both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, while exercise training decreases blood pressure in overweight/obese individuals with high normal blood pressure and hypertension
Participation in active living programs can lead to:
Experts agree that over half of all cancers in developed countries could be prevented if population-wide measures to promote healthy behaviors (including weight control, implementation of a healthy diet, the reduction of tobacco use, and the increase of physical activity) were implemented.
Physical activity lowers the risk of colon cancer and breast cancer. Physical activity has also served as an effective tool in rehabilitating patients with breast cancer. Workplace health promotion programs can reduce cancer risks.
Exercise significantly reduces the risk of developing insulin-resistance by improving glucose tolerance and insulin action in individuals predisposed to develop type 2 diabetes.
Lifestyle intervention programs involving diet and/or exercise reduced the progression of impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes. Moderate physical activity combined with weight loss and a balanced diet can confer a 50-60% reduction in risk of developing diabetes among those already at high risk.
Regular physical activity has been linked to:
Active living has been linked to:
Participation in physical activities can lead to improved aerobic capacity and increased maximum oxygen uptake.
Reduced risk factors, occurrence and duration of illness and age-adjusted mortality rates have all been connected to participation in regular physical activity.
Participation in active workplace programs has been linked to:
Worksite programs show a modest but positive effect in obtaining smoking cessation among employees. Participants in active living programs are more likely to reduce or eliminate smoking from their lifestyle, especially if they are also registered in a smoking cessation program.
The promotion of physical activity and healthy living in the workplace can lead to:
Embracing an active lifestyle can promote:
Most organizations that have introduced physical activity programs or initiatives and have tracked the results report that participating employees are pleased with the results.
Employer reports generally include reference to the following elements:
Active employees report feeling:
Active employees report higher job satisfaction than non-active employees. Executives in one company stated that they believed that the workplace fitness program has had a positive impact on the company's ability to attract high-caliber employees.
A corporate commitment to employee fitness contributes to:
The ability of a physically active executive group to make complex decisions increased dramatically compared to non-exercisers.
Participants in physical activity programs report that:
Some studies report that employees involved in physical activity programs commit fewer errors on tasks involving concentration and short-term memory as compared to workers not involved in physical activity programs
Studies suggest that when compared to the average office worker, whose efficiency decreases 50% for the final two hours of the working day, exercise adherents work at full efficiency all day, amounting to a 12.5% increase in personal productivity
In summary, studies show that individual work performance can be improved by a factor of 4-15% when people are engaged in regular physical activity.
1. Health Care / Health Insurance Costs
A review of 23 studies which examined health-care cost outcomes of health promotion and workplace wellness programs found an average reduction 26% in health-care costs.
2. Short Term Disability / Workers' Compensation (WCB/WSIB)
Active living programs reduce the costs of short-term disability programs because they reduce the number of claims/incidents and they reduce the duration of incidents.
Physically fit workers have fewer injuries. When injuries do occur, they tend to be shorter in duration and therefore less costly. For example:
3. Reduced Absenteeism
Organizations have reported that physical activity programs reduce absenteeism by up to 20%. This demonstrates an improvement of up to 1.6 days in attendance per participant, per year. For example: In Canada, this varies from as little as 0.8 days at Canada Post, to 3.35 days at Metropolitan Toronto, and 6.5 days at Canada Safeway in Winnipeg.
Results from selected studies indicate that physically active employees take 27% fewer days of sick leave. For example: BC Hydro estimates $1.2 million in reduced sick leave costs annually as a result of physical activity initiative.
4. Reduced Turnover
The turnover rate among fitness program participants is lower than for non-participants. For example: this has amounted to 8.1% less turnover at Canada Life, 13% at Tenneco and 7% at BC Hydro.
Canada Life in Toronto showed a return on investment of $3.40 on each corporate dollar invested on reduced turnover, as well as productivity gains and decreased medical claims.
Dr. Roy Shephard found corporate wellness programs returned a cumulative economic benefit of $500-$700 per worker, per year.
Municipal employees in Toronto missed 3.35 fewer days in the first six months of their 'Metro Fit' fitness programs than employees not enrolled in the program.
BC Hydro employees enrolled in a work-sponsored fitness program had a turnover rate of 3.5% compared with the company average of 10.3%.
The Canadian Life Assurance Company found that the turnover rate for fitness program participants was 32.4% lower than the average over a seven-year period.
Toronto Life Assurance found that employee turnover for those enrolled in the company's fitness program was 1.5% versus 15% for non-participants.
A review of 16 studies of worksite health promotion programs which reported on benefit-cost ratios reported an average benefit-to-cost ratio of 5.93.