Public Health Agency of Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

Measuring Results

Benchmark Research & Performance Measurements

To prove that an active living and wellness program is indeed beneficial to the organization, it is important to establish a benchmark for employee health and wellness before the program begins.

Benchmark research should examine:

  • Employee activity levels before the program is started;
  • Employee health;
  • Current costs of illness to benefit programs;
  • Stress levels;
  • Absenteeism patterns;
  • Employee satisfaction;
  • Retention rates; and
  • Productivity and performance.

After the program has been running for at least a year, follow-up research should be undertaken to measure the short-term results of the active living intervention.

Typically, performance measurement enables an organization to:

  • Determine if a program has been implemented as planned (process measurement);
  • Determine if a program has met its quality assurance criteria (process measurement);
  • Assess if a program is attracting the volume of participants that it intended (process measurement);
  • Document the individual employee health impacts of a program (impact measurement);
  • Identify the health outcomes of a program as it relates to disability management and absenteeism rates (outcome measurement);
  • Determine the cost benefit of a program (outcome measurement); and
  • Establish whether an ongoing commitment to the program is justified.
Return to Top of Page

Process Measurements

Process measurements review short-term program/intervention oriented results - these are quality control measures aimed at determining if the program/intervention itself has achieved its objectives.

Typical process measurements include:

  • Participation rates;
  • Adherence levels (if a long-term program);
  • Participant satisfaction;
  • Perceived value; and
  • Management commitment.
Return to Top of Page

Impact Measurements

Impact measurements review medium-term individual employee results. They identify whether or not intended individual health outcomes are occurring on a personal level.

Typical impact measurements may include:

  • Decreased employee health risk - usually through health-risk assessments;
  • Improved health beliefs and attitudes - through health surveys;
  • Improved perceived health status - through health surveys;
  • Readiness for change - through health surveys;
  • Improved employee satisfaction, as measured by a questionnaire;
  • Employee perception of greater personal power and control over their work environment, as measured by certain stress indicators;
  • Reduced incidence of new cardiovascular cases on Short-Term Disability and Long-Term Disability; and
  • Reduced incidence of new musculoskeletal injuries.
Return to Top of Page

Outcome Measurements

Outcome measurements are longer-term, organization-oriented results that indicate whether or not a program is generating the intended economic outcomes for the organization.

Typical outcome measures include:

  • Decreased incidence of illness or injury associated with stress, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal disorders;
  • Reduction in the length of a disability associated with stress, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal disorders;
  • Cost savings in health benefits such as long-term disability, short-term disability (and/or weekly indemnity), Workers' Compensation, and drug utilization associated with stress, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal disorders; and
  • Financial measurements, including cost/benefit analysis and return on investment calculations.