[Previous] [Table of Contents] [Next]
The Healthy Living Program (HLP) is part of the Government of Canada’s contribution to the Integrated Pan-Canadian Healthy Living Strategy, an inter-sectoral framework for sustained collaborative action to reduce non-communicable disease in Canada. The Program is part of the Integrated Strategy on Healthy Living and Chronic Disease (ISHCD), the federal framework for public health activities, in keeping with the federal role, across the spectrum of health and chronic-disease and through disease-specific strategies on diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease.1 As part of the ISHLCD, the HLP spans the six core public health functions, including:
1 Healthy Living Roadmap, PHAC June 2008
A healthy nation in which Canadians experience the conditions that support the attainment of good health, through regular physical activity, healthy eating and maintenance of healthy weights.
To improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities among Canadians.
To lead, foster and support action to address the conditions that support healthy eating, physical activity and healthy weights for all Canadians and with a specific focus on sub-populations experiencing health disparities, such as: children and youth; those in isolated, remote and rural areas; and Aboriginal communities.
The Healthy Living Program is composed of the following four core components: the Healthy Living Fund (HLF); the Intersectoral Healthy Living Network (IHLN); Knowledge Development and Exchange (KD&E); and Social Marketing.
The following section describes each of the four components. The associated logic models are contained in Annex A.
The Healthy Living Fund (HLF) (national and regional stream) is a federal contribution program to address effective, sustainable actions at all levels that promote healthy living and provide supportive social and physical environments for health. The key activities associated with the HLF cover three major areas:
The national stream uses contribution agreements with national organizations on national projects to create the knowledge, skills, tools and resources needed to help communities, organizations and individuals act to improve their health. A solicitation guide was developed and an open call for proposals was carried out. Fifty funding submissions were received for consideration. A review panel was established with PHAC representatives as well as evaluators from the sector. Twelve projects were recommended for funding and submitted within the PHAC approval process for approval by the Minister. Given a legacy issue with one of the organizations requesting funding, 11 of the 12 projects were ultimately approved for funding. Funding of $4.359 million over 18 months, was announced in September 2007.
Funding recipients are required to complete the standardized PHAC Project Evaluation and Reporting Tool (PERT). The PERT is a form that has been developed to monitor and document the effectiveness of all participating PHAC programs, and to assess the impact these community-based programs are making on the health of Canadians and Canadian communities. PERT enables all programs to collect the same categories of information, using the same methods. The information gathered by the PERT is used to measure and assess the implementation, impact, and effectiveness of PHAC-funded programs. Project staff received training on PERT and program staff review PERT questionnaires from the funding recipients for accuracy. The PERT is comprised of the following sections:
Through the regional stream of the HLF, PHAC created a bilateral agreement process that focused on joint priorities and matched funding by P/Ts for physical activity and healthy eating projects. PHAC program personnel and P/T representatives established individual Bilateral Agreements to meet their objectives. The level of sign-off at the P/T level varied. All Bilateral Agreements have recently been signed and projects are being initiated. A joint coordinating committee was established with participants from both levels of government to administer the agreements and oversee the implementation and reporting. The regional stream will also be using PERT for project monitoring and reporting.
The Intersectoral Healthy Living Network (IHLN) is a virtual pan-Canadian network dedicated to fostering partnerships and improving collaboration and information exchange among sectors and across jurisdictions in support of healthy living. The Network brings together a number of existing virtual networks, acting as a central mechanism to facilitate communication among members in order to advance the vision and goals of the Integrated Pan-Canadian Healthy Living Strategy. The objectives of the IHLN are implemented through the Health Living Issue Group (HLIG).
The Healthy Living Social Marketing efforts, managed by the PHAC Communications Directorate, seek to foster positive societal behaviour change through the aligned efforts of a federal social marketing and public education campaign and a pan-Canadian communication strategy. Budget 2005 allocated $14 million over five years and $3 million ongoing for social marketing activities.
The Knowledge Development and Exchange (KD&E) component is a central health promotion function that creates a platform for evidence-based action on healthy living. It bridges the continuum from creating and collecting knowledge to making informed policy and program decisions. Knowledge development combines evidence from a variety of sources, including surveillance, scientific studies, the PERT, opinion and policy research to derive options and solutions to guide public health decision-making by individuals, organizations and governments. Knowledge exchange seeks to bring experts and end-users together to share information about needs, gaps, priorities and products.
The KD&E function of the Healthy Living Program focuses on informing policy and program decision-making through knowledge capacity development, new knowledge development, knowledge synthesis, and ongoing national and international dissemination and exchange. The KD&E functions rely on statistical and research skills, as well as knowledge of key data sets and players in the field, including academia, NGOs and other levels of government, both domestic and international.
The following table includes a breakdown of the planned resources for the Healthy Living Program. The table is broken down by the four components and shown with the categories of human resources i.e., full-time equivalents (FTEs), Operations and Maintenance (O&M) and Grants and Contributions (G&Cs) budgets.
| Budget in $ | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | 2009-10 (ongoing) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Living Fund | ||||
| FTEs | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| O&M | 527,216 | 555,252 | 655,252 | 715,252 |
| G&C | 2,750,000 | 5,640,000 | 5,540,000 | 5,480,000 |
| Intersectoral Healthy Living Network | ||||
| FTEs | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| O&M | 192,027 | 199,481 | 199,482 | 199,481 |
| G&C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Social Marketing | ||||
| FTEs | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| O&M | 2,669,645 | 2,536,368 | 2,536,368 | 2,536,368 |
| G&C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Knowledge Development & Exchange | ||||
| FTEs | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| O&M | 448,269 | 1,322,721 | 1,222,723 | 1,122,724 |
| G&C | 200,000 | 300,000 | 400,000 | 500,000 |
| Healthy Living Program Totals | ||||
| FTEs | 15.3 | 15.3 | 15.3 | 15.4 |
| O&M | $3,837, 157 | $4,613,822 | $4,613,825 | $4,573,825 |
| G&C | $2,950,000 | $5,940,000 | $5,940,000 | $5,980,000 |
The following financial figures have been provided to the evaluators summarizing actual expenditures as of January 23, 2009. Detailed analysis was not undertaken due to time constraints. However, the table indicates significant variances from the planned resources figures outlined above.
| Actual in $ | 2006/2007 | 2007/2008 | 2008/2009 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Living Fund | |||
| FTEs | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| O&M | 34,235 | 256,121 | 79,427 |
| G&C | 1,757,771 | 4,614,592 | 5,482,403 |
| Intersectoral Healthy Living Network | |||
| FTEs | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| O&M | 73,868 | 58,421 | |
| G&C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Social Marketing | |||
| FTEs | 0 | 0 | |
| O&M | 2,900,000 | 1,300,000 | 1,316,500 |
| G&C | 0 | 1,600,000 | 1,500,000 |
| Knowledge Development & Exchange | |||
| FTEs | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| O&M | 84,267 | 41,914 | |
| G&C | 966,310 | 1,044,000 | 1,155,380 |
| Healthy Living Program Totals | |||
| FTEs | 4.8 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| O&M | $2,934,235 | $1,714,256 | $1,496,262 |
| G&C | $2,724,081 | $5,658,592 | $8,237,783 |
The remainder of this report is divided into four sections:
It should be noted that the findings information, contained in section 3, are sequenced and presented according to the evaluation framework. As such, the evaluation question is introduced and then the related findings are presented across the four components. For efficiency, this format has been adopted for all evaluation questions.
The Annexes contain the following information
[Previous] [Table of Contents] [Next]
To share this page just click on the social network icon of your choice.